Category: Opinion

  • Bed-Wetting: A Common Childhood Issue

    Bed-Wetting: A Common Childhood Issue

    My mum woke me up every morning with a spank for soaking my dress and bed with urine. At first I cowered at the sight of my wet bed each morning, but as time progressed I got used to being punished for it.

    With all the spanking and yelling, I guess my bladder couldn’t understand simple English to obey the instruction of not wetting my bed, as we went on night after night, repeating the same pattern.

    Some days I’ll wake up with confidence, telling mum I excused myself to urinate at night, but amidst all that, I could feel the wetness of my clothes. How come? I keep asking and expecting an answer. After much defense, it would dawn on me how it was all my imagination playing tricks with me as it was on my bed I urinated.

    I despised it even more when Mum asked me to sun dry my bed because the thought of my friends pointing fingers at me as the girl who urinates on the bed made me feel ashamed. It went on and on until I was able to understand my body and wake up to urinate when nature called. Getting to understand my body started with mum constantly waking me up at intervals every night to urinate.

    Bed wetting is a natural phenomenon that comes with a lot of shaming and punishment for kids by parents who forget that children who are bedwetting can’t help it. Funnily enough, some tag it as a spiritual problem. Is it really spiritual like they say?

    Your child might be bed wetting due to:

    SMALL BLADDER: Your child might be bedwetting because they have not developed their bladder properly. The ability to control urine is in stages. However, children do not develop at the same age. There’s a possibility your child has a smaller bladder that has the average capacity and a higher rate of urine production over night and a higher level of bladder muscle activity.

    HORMONAL IMBALANCE: During childhood, some kids do not produce enough antidiuretic hormone, also called ADH. ADH slows down how much urine is made during the night.

    FAMILY HISTORY: If one or both of a child’s parents wet the bed as a child, the child has an increased chance of wetting the bed, too.

    STRESS AND ANXIETY: Stressful events may trigger bed-wetting. When a child plays too much and is stressed out during the day with involvement in different activities, most of the time it leads to bed-wetting.

    DEEP SLEEPING: A child who is a deep sleeper can also be bed wetting. The child finds it difficult to wake up when the urge to urinate comes.

    Any of the above could be the reason why that child bed wets, it’s a fallacy to say it’s spiritual. Rather than punish a child who can’t help himself or herself, why not derive methods to help him or her stop bed-wetting? You could do the following to help:

    You can help your child master their body at night to help control their urine by:

    BLADDER TRAINING: Set up an alarm at intervals to help your child urinate at night. Have the child urinate at least two times at intervals of 30 minutes before going to bed.

    FLUID INTAKE: Limit fluid intake hours before bedtime. Make sure the child avoids taking anything fluid be it water, juice, or any caffeinated drinks.

    LIMIT SUGARY DRINKS: Reduce the amount of sugary drinks you give to the child, it can irritate the bladder.

    BE ENCOURAGING: Appreciate the child on days he goes dry all through the night, encourage and give the child the necessary support needed.

    These steps have been proven to be effective and have worked on lots of kids, as there is no drug prescription to stop bed wetting, as it is natural and stops with time.

  • The Hidden Cost of Feminine Beauty – By Samson Abanni

    The Hidden Cost of Feminine Beauty – By Samson Abanni

    We have come a long way as a specie but the most sellable product is still the feminine look.

    What are looks to a woman? It is how her religion is judged. It is how her beauty is rated. It is how her morality is measured. It is how her opportunities are metered. It is how her achievements are gauged. Perhaps it’s because, even though some societies have removed the rules imposed on women, they have not changed the reward system. Society rewards men for what they achieve and rewards women for how they look. Many times the things women admire are bestowed using looks as criteria. A woman can be anything she wants to be—but she should be beautiful, and that definition of beauty can be punishing and un-elastic. We are not so much products of our decisions as we are of societal expectations—not what society says its expectations are, but what they are in reality. Sure we can choose to be different, but we can’t go too far without feeling like outcasts or psychopaths.

    There’s has always been a battle over women’s bodies—whether it’s about how it should look, how much should be seen or covered or who should be the judge. The attention paid to a woman’s body reflects its power. And it is indeed powerful. In many places now, things have changed. But that does not mean things are better. In the past, society had a written code women must live by; now women make it themselves. Whether the rules are external or internal, a woman’s body still has guidelines to live by. Women broke society’s hold—and re-imposed it on themselves as they now go to extreme length to get and keep the acceptable feminine look. This is not freedom; it is throwing away your slave master—and taking his place.

    Many people found time, in the very serious allegations made against Senator Natasha Akpoti, to rhapsodize about her beauty. I guess, for many, that was their main motivation for entering the fight. Once a woman meets society’s standards of beauty, society feels responsible to protect its prized object—as long as she survives those trying to pluck her plumage. But to ask any woman to keep her plumage forever is impossible, and they really try—which is why those in the beauty business will always have a job. I suppose the demand arose because men now have to share power; and once power is shared, responsibility is also shared.

    The problem with chasing an unrealistic body shape is that you will never arrive. There are social theories that point toward the fact that pointing women to an impossible ideal is a conscious political action. Socializing women to be invested in achieving an unrealistically slender and highly groomed appearance diverts energies and resources away from other (political and social) activities and keep their ingenuity off that space.  In addition, these theories highlight how the objectification of women—particularly through media images—leads women to internalize the need to self-monitor their bodies, in effect becoming their own body police, counting calories, layering on make-up and offering themselves to the surgeon’s knife. Another theory by Bourdieu says the acceleration of highly visual culture, facilitated by digital technologies in recent years, has exacerbated the extent to which appearance is a central source of capital worldwide. Body capital sees a beautiful body as wealth or a source of wealth thus justifying any investment that goes into attaining the perfect look.

    Beauty is indeed beautiful. There are few humans who have not been enlivened by looking at beautiful woman, but this social good should never become a life’s mission. The society has to cut women lose from the tyranny of our punishing beauty expectations. You cannot judge a forty year old by the same skin glow standard of that an 18 year old radiates, and to convince the forty year old women they are free, we have to continue the worship of her beauty through her changing seasons, there she will feel no loss and try to move heaven and earth to keep a glow that time has robbed her off. And women have to rebel, not just against societal expectations but from their need to continue self-administering those rules when the society grudgingly take them off.

    Abanni is a Medical Doctor and Member of the Board of Editors of Pacesetter Frontier Magazine.

  • June 12: Democratic Covenant and the  Resolute Statesmanship of Rep. Nnolim Nnaji

    June 12: Democratic Covenant and the  Resolute Statesmanship of Rep. Nnolim Nnaji

    By Ezefi Mike Udoh

    In the august liturgy of our national memory, there exists a day so solemn, so charged with the undying fervor of the people’s will, that it transcends the realm of calendar and history—it becomes, indeed, a living testament to the irrepressible spirit of liberty. That day is June the Twelfth: Nigeria’s Democracy Day.

    This date, sanctified not by mere proclamation but by the blood and ballots of a defrauded electorate, stands as a moral lodestar in our republican odyssey. It was on that fateful day in 1993 that the Nigerian people, across every creed and clime, rose as one to affirm their inalienable right to self-governance. And yet, the euphoria of that electoral symphony was silenced by the iron hand of tyranny. But from that audacious betrayal sprang forth a deeper, more resolute yearning—a covenant etched not on parchment, but upon the indelible conscience of a nation awakened.

    June 12 is not merely a date; it is a reckoning. A day when the silenced found speech, when courage eclipsed fear, and when the idea of Nigeria—as a democratic commonwealth governed by the rule of law—was reborn in defiance and in dignity.

    It is within this noble continuum of democratic resilience that we behold the distinguished personage of Right Honourable Nnolim Nnaji, Member of the House of Representatives, a true paragon of statesmanly grace and legislative probity. Heir to the enduring virtues of service and sacrifice, Rt. Hon. Nnaji has, through unwavering fidelity to the democratic creed, become a venerable guardian of the people’s trust.

    Representing the renown constituency of Nkanu East and West, the Honourable Member has borne the mantle of public duty not as a privilege, but as a sacred charge. Within the hallowed chambers of Nigeria’s National Assembly, his voice resounds—not with self-serving ambition—but with the measured cadence of wisdom, compassion, and nation-first conviction. His legislative endeavours speak to the soul of June 12: the enthronement of justice, the fortification of institutions, and the elevation of the common man above the machinery of impunity.

    Indeed, Rt. Hon. Nnaji has not merely inhabited the office of a lawmaker; he has redeemed its purpose. His interventions are not perfunctory recitations of political ritual but are imbued with the gravity of one who understands that democracy, in its truest form, is the enthronement of the people’s will, sanctified by relentless service.

    Thus, as the Republic marks another anniversary of this hallowed day, let every heart pause in reverence, and every mind ponder its significance. Let the names of the valiant—known and unknown—be whispered in gratitude. And let us, in unison, lift our voices in celebration not only of the democratic promise that June 12 heralds, but also of the gallant stewards like Rt. Hon. Nnolim Nnaji, who by diligence, integrity, and quiet strength, keep the flame of that promise ever burning.

    For as long as leaders such as he walk the hallways of governance with humility and honour, Nigeria’s democratic experiment shall neither waver nor wither—but shall blossom into the full measure of its sovereign destiny.

    Happy Democracy Day!

    Ezefi Mike Udoh writes from Ihunekwagu, Akpugo.

  • Curbing Examination Malpractice in Nigerian Tertiary Institutions: A National Call to Action

    Curbing Examination Malpractice in Nigerian Tertiary Institutions: A National Call to Action

    By Sebastine Chukwuebuka Okafor

    Examination malpractice is a serious threat to the growth of university education across Nigeria.

    It can be defined in many ways. It means any dishonest act that affects the fairness and honesty of the examination process. It includes any illegal or wrong action taken before, during, or after an exam to get higher marks. It also means breaking exam rules to gain an unfair advantage or any kind of cheating or dishonest behaviour by a student during an exam.

    This dishonest act weakens the academic standards that schools are expected to protect. It damages the very foundation of our education system.

    As a lecturer and former Faculty Examination Marshal in one of the best universities in Nigeria, I have seen how examination malpractice affects students and the reputation of the school they come from. This issue must be dealt with quickly before it becomes normal and spreads a habit of dishonesty that will destroy the value of education across the country.

    It is sad that both students and staff in many of our higher institutions do not see how serious this issue is. This is clear from the way people ignore it or delay actions that could stop it. Based on close observation, the causes of examination malpractice in Nigeria’s higher institutions can be grouped into three major areas: student-related reasons, problems within the institutions, and issues from society.

    Student-related reasons include pressure to succeed, fear of failure, poor study habits, and pressure from friends — all these can lead students into cheating.

    Institutional problems include poor teaching, weak monitoring, bad exam seating plans, too much importance placed on exams, and easy access to materials used for cheating. These show that better teaching and exam support are needed.

    Societal issues include corrupt lecturers and staff, the way cheating is accepted in society, and soft punishments for those who cheat. These make students feel they can cheat and get away with it.

    These problems exist in many schools and call for a wide and united effort to stop examination malpractice.

    To fix this problem, university leaders and managers of other higher institutions in Nigeria need to take strong and serious steps. They must put in place a number of plans that deal with the real causes of malpractice — like what is done in some private universities such as Godfrey Okoye University, Enugu.

    Some people think the problem has become normal and cannot be solved. But should we accept that? The answer is no. There are clear solutions, and they can be divided into four groups: prevention, education, punishment, and changes to the system.

    Prevention includes proper monitoring by lecturers from other departments, mixing students from different courses during exams to make cheating harder, and using technology such as internet blockers, AI tools to catch cheating, and fingerprint systems to confirm student identity and stop impersonation.

    Education will focus on teaching students why cheating is bad, training older lecturers on how to detect new cheating methods, and keeping a photo record of students in each exam, like what is used in the Mass Communication Department at Enugu State University of Science and Technology (ESUT). Also, the 75% attendance rule should be fully enforced, and lecturers who follow this rule should be given support. This will help students stay more prepared and disciplined before any exam.

    Punishment should include quick action and fair penalties for those who cheat, with parents also getting involved to encourage better conduct. Students should be punished not just for cheating, but also for helping others to cheat. This will reduce the number of people trying to cheat during exams. When students know that even sitting close to someone who is cheating can lead to trouble, they will be more careful.

    System changes should focus on regular assessments during the semester, not just final exams. Exams should test practical knowledge, not only memory. Lecturers should also be in charge of student attendance and exam quality. Schools should work with security agencies or create strong teams to watch over exams and catch those who break the rules, and make sure their cases are reported to the right authorities.

    These actions will do more than stop cheating. They will help build good values, raise the quality of learning, and make students more responsible in our schools.

    Examination malpractice is a big problem that needs urgent attention from school authorities, lecturers, students, and all who care about education.

    The steps listed here provide a strong way to deal with this challenge. They will help bring honesty back to academics and protect the name of Nigerian universities.

    We must act now to stop examination malpractice and improve the standard of education — for the good of our students, our schools, and our country.

  • The Deadly War on Women and Children 

    The Deadly War on Women and Children 

    -By Abdul Mahmud

    Childbirth is a death sentence in our country. It shouldn’t be. But it is. Our country loses a woman every seven minutes. That’s not a statistic. That is not just a scream in the dark, it is a cry searing the blinding daylight of a country that has grown numb to both the living and the dying. A country where indifference is policy, and silence is the only answer to suffering. A final breath. A mother dying while giving life. The BBC reports that our country is the world’s worst place to beget life. One woman dies every seven minutes. That’s 75,000 maternal deaths in one year. That’s 29% of all maternal deaths worldwide. Almost one in every three. That’s not a crisis. That’s a collapse. That number should shame our country and us as citizens. It doesn’t.

    This tells a story. A tragic, brutal, relentless story. Of women bleeding to death in clinics. On beds without bedsheets. With midwives who have no gloves. Of babies born into silence. Of widowers cradling newborns. Poor fathers. Of children growing up without mothers. Of families shattered by the simple biological act of childbirth. But childbirth here isn’t straightforward. It’s war. It’s women walking kilometres to underfunded hospitals. It’s labour rooms without light. Clinics without water. It’s rusted scissors. Torn gloves. Nurses working with torchlights. And stillbirths that go uncounted. Here? Emergency care is a complete farce. Blood banks? Dry. Anaesthesia? Non-existent. Bandages to hold cannulas in place? Paper stickers. Ambulances?

    Pregnant women in labour hop on keke ride and on a prayer.

    This is our country – the land of our birth.

    A country rich in oil and gas. Rich in resources. But bankrupt in everything else, including leadership.

    The women who die are poor. They are urban and rural. They are the forgotten ones. They are invisible. Their deaths don’t make much of the daily news. Their stories don’t make policy. They die in silence. Buried without outrage.

    But, it doesn’t end with mothers.

    Our children die too. Quietly. Slowly. Around and about. Development Reporting, a specialist media outfit, said it clearly. Our children are failed by the system. Unvaccinated. Malnourished. Out of school. Sick. Abandoned. They are growing up in hunger. In pain. They live without food. Without teachers. Without nurses. Without any chance. They have been left behind. To die. One in ten of our children never reach their fifth birthday. Most deaths are preventable. Malaria. Pneumonia. Diarrhoea. Hunger. Simple diseases that kill fast because our country’s healthcare system habitually kills.

    One in three children is stunted. That means their brains and bodies won’t grow as they should. That means their futures are already stolen. Malnourished children can’t learn. They can’t compete. They can’t lead. Our country has failed them. Repeatedly. Brutally. Little wonder the late, iconic South African-born reggae legend, Lucky Dube, lamented the moral decay of Africa’s governing class. “They won’t build no schools anymore,” he sang, “all they’ll build will be prison, prison.” His words echo like prophecy across our country’s broken landscape. If he had trained his mind on our country’s governing elite, he might well have added: they don’t build hospitals anymore; all they construct are flyovers to nowhere. Perhaps, to Samarkand where fantasy lives and the sick are not their burden.

    And, yet, our country pretends that all is well and good. While 18 million children are out of school, it pretends. While millions live in slums, drink dirty water, and battle diseases, it pretends. While clinics run out of vaccines, it pretends still. While mothers weep over graves, it turns its eyes in the direction of Afghanistan. The governing elite are the worst culprits. Does the holy book not say, “Blessed are those who mourn, for they shall be comforted”? But these ones will not mourn. They do not weep for the dead. They do not grieve with the bereaved. Their hearts are sealed. Their eyes are dry. They soar, detached, above the suffering of ordinary citizens like Achebe’s Eneke the bird, who learned to fly without perching because men had learned to shoot without missing. Our rulers now fly too, sky-high, far above the dust and death they leave behind.

    The president. His wife. The vice president. They spent N23 billion on foreign travel last year. That’s not a typo. N23 billion. For comfort. For luxury. For medical treatment. Paris for medical check-ups; but, masked as working holidays. Dubai for toothaches. Germany for routine tests. London for rest. While back home, women are stitched without anaesthesia. Children die from coughs. While hospitals turn from Buhari’s mere consulting clinics to morgues. Here’s the truth: they flee the country they ruined. They simply cop out to countries that others built. Where they don’t cop out, they hide inside the world of opulence they built for themselves from the stolen commonwealth. They don’t feel citizens’ pains. They don’t know what it means to hear a child convulse and die because there’s no oxygen. They don’t know what it feels like to hold a woman’s hand while she dies from a ruptured womb. They don’t bury children. They bury money. In Swiss accounts. Offshore firms. Dollar vaults. The Panama Papers reveal the truth. While our own currency can’t buy Panadol.

    Our corrupt governing elite have eaten everything. Ours is now a country of locusts. Budgets are padded. Health budgets are looted. Drugs are stolen. Equipment is resold. Nurses and doctors, left unpaid and unappreciated, flee our country’s shores in despair, seeking dignity in foreign lands. In a moment that captured the callous indifference of our governing elite, former Minister of Labour, Chris Ngige, shamelessly declared that the exodus of doctors was of little consequence because, according to him, our country “has more than enough medical personnel… if you have surplus, you export”. It was a boast swaddled in ignorance, and beneath it lay the tragic arithmetic of a ruined country. The World Health Organisation’s data pierces through Ngige’s fiction like light through the dark: as far back as 2013, our country had only 3.8 doctors for every 10,000 citizens; a ratio far below the WHO’s recommended ratio of one doctor to 600 patients. Twelve years on, the ratio hasn’t changed. This is not surplus; it is scarcity masquerading as strength. It is the cruel irony of a ruined country bleeding expertise while its governing elite speak in the hollow cadences of denial.

    Our country has signed all manner of treaties.

    The Sustainable Development Goals. The UN conventions. The AU declarations. Our country pledges. Our country makes promises. But nothing is fulfilled. Nothing reaches the dying woman in the cities and villages. Nothing saves the baby in the overcrowded wards of urban hospitals. Data is manipulated. Numbers are cooked. Reports are buried. Truth is hidden. But graves don’t lie.

    Our mothers are dying. And no one is asking why they are dying. Even if someone is asking, no one is answering. Our governing elite are pursuing policies of indifference and neglect by design. Failure by choice. It is deliberate because they aren’t the victims of their own failure. They are protected from it. They are immune. They are medical tourists. Their wives won’t deliver in local clinics. Their babies won’t sleep on bare floors. Their lives are insured. Citizens’ lives are not. And so, our country stays broken. Because it works for them. Because there are no consequences for enthroning failure. So, they go on commissioning 30 kilometres highway and bus stops, and unveiling white elephant projects. Hosting summits. Garlanding foreign visitors. Taking photos. Saying prayers. Meanwhile, more women keep dying. Children keep vanishing into the abyss. Citizens are told to be patient. To renew hope. But hope is not a hospital. Faith is not healthcare. Prayer doesn’t fix a torn placenta. Or stop post-partum bleeding. Or treat jaundice. Only investment. Only real governance. Only the political will of a responsible governing elite who know what to do: train midwives. Equip hospitals. Provide ambulances. Fund primary healthcare. Pay doctors and nurses. Build systems. Enforce accountability. These are not puzzles wrapped in enigma; they are the fundamental functions of a competent state. Rwanda has done it, with clarity of purpose and political will. Ghana has made earnest strides. Even Sierra Leone, scarred by war and poverty, is learning to rise. But here in our republic, our rulers talk. They convene conferences. They inaugurate committees with fanfare. They rename hospitals as though renaming heals the sick. They switch uniforms as if new fabrics could staunch the bleeding. But they do not save lives. They perform the ritual of governance without its substance.

    And the cost?

    It is written in the silence of empty cradles and the wails of orphaned children. Seventy-five thousand women lost in a single year, not to the Boko Haram war; but to preventable complications. Buried without headlines. Yet, our governing elite have not declared it a war. There are no national mourning days. No flags lowered. No outrage. Just the quiet erasure of women, whose only crime was to give life in a country that does not value life. But it is war. On the poor. On the voiceless. On mothers. On children.

    Every maternal death is a failure of leadership. Every child’s grave is a scandal. Every hospital without drugs is a crime scene. Citizens must speak louder. They must make their votes count. A country that abandons its women and children abandons its soul. This is not fate. This is not nature at work. These are premeditated murders. Matricide enabled. Infanticide engineered. Deaths orchestrated and sustained by our governing elite.

    Silent though it is, our country is waging a war against women and children; and the generals of that war, the very men and women entrusted to protect the citizens, are the ones who pry open wounds, mother after mother, and children upon their first cries. Happily, history offers the lamp to courageous citizens who think of the Parisians who stormed the Bastille with unyielding revolutionary will and seek to enact their own history, not with bloodied pikes; but with their ballots, voices, and unyielding civic will.

    That chapter in history will not be written by fate, but by paragraphs that citizens shall compose by choice.

    Beware.

    May our dead find peace.

  • EFCC Raids in Nigeria: Helping the Nation or Serving Other Interests?

    EFCC Raids in Nigeria: Helping the Nation or Serving Other Interests?

    By Sebastine Chukwuebuka Okafor

    When the administration of President Olusegun Obasanjo commenced the establishment of the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission, EFCC, in 2003, it was a way of responding to the then growing concern over the increase in economic and financial crimes such as advance fee fraud, money laundering, corruption, and other financial crimes. It took some months before it was fully established under the EFCC Act 2004, and the commission was empowered to investigate all financial crimes, enforce relevant laws, and coordinate efforts of other institutions involved in the fight against corruption. Then, Nigeria faced very bad pressure from international agencies, especially the Financial Action Task Force (FATF), due to its global reputation as the then hub of internet scams and financial crimes. Before EFCC, FATF had placed Nigeria on its Non-Cooperative Countries and Territories (NCCTs).

    Charged with the responsibility of investigating financial crimes and bringing offenders to justice, enforcement of economic and financial crimes laws, prevention and combat of financial crimes laws, prevention and combating of financial and economic crimes, amongst others, many Nigerians weren’t comfortable with the idea because the country already had the Independent Corrupt Practices and Other Related Offences Commission (ICPC) that was trying her best at that time. To some, it was a creation of the executive arm of government which would be used to witch-hunt the opposition voices and blackmail targeted individuals; some saw it as an extension of the Nigerian police, while others saw it as a welcomed development. President Obasanjo appointed Mallam Nuhu Ribadu as the first chairman of the commission, who did his best to fight corruption, even though corruption tried everything possible to fight back, but he remained resolute.

    In EFCC, there are different departments that enable its work to progress, as created by the EFCC Act 2004. The departments include Operations Department, Legal and Prosecution Department, Intelligence and Special Operations Department, Administration and Human Resources Department, Finance and Accounts Department, Information and Communication Technology (ICT) Department, Media and Public Affairs Department, Capacity Development Department, Asset Forfeiture and Recovery Management Department, Research and Documentation Department.

    In all these departments, the most popular and controversial are the Operation, Legal, and Prosecution. This is because, when Nigerians hear about EFCC, it is either they arrested someone or people, raided an environment, charged a suspect to court, or got someone convicted. The Operation arm has been criticized recently by many Nigerians and the global world due to their unethical and unprofessional approach to their duties, especially late-night raiding, as well as alleged abuse of office, as many say they break too many laws while trying to enforce a law.

    These departments, since the establishment of the commission, have engaged in activities that have provided a bad image to the commission, especially from revered organizations, groups, legal experts, and individuals. In one of their nefarious activities, renowned legal luminary Dr. Olisa Agbakoba, while talking on May 7th, 2024, said, “I very strongly believe the EFCC is unconstitutionally established… The EFCC is an unlawful organisation,” declared Dr. Olisa Agbakoba (SAN), former NBA President, in an interview published on May 7, 2024, calling for legal reform of the commission’s mandate (Punch Newspapers, 7 May 2024). This statement also tallied with another by Oluwalanu Agusto, a Nigerian illustrator and author, who said, “Nigeria has too many problems for the EFCC to be arresting people over frivolous issues. Have they chased the politicians embezzling billions?” he asked, in an interview published May 14, 2024 (Financial Times, 14 May 2024). Also, Olu Fasan, a public policy analyst, in a critical op-ed on December 15, 2023, questioned EFCC’s credibility as an anti-corruption agency, as published by the Nigerian Observer on 15 December 2023. According to him, “The agency is so bedevilled that it has become part of the problem, not part of the solution.”

    One of the things that have made many question the operation guidelines of the commission was when it began to go against itself. On the 1st of November, 2023, EFCC banned night raids after widespread condemnation. According to reports, “The EFCC itself issued a directive banning sting operations at night after civil society organizations and the public condemned the agency’s midnight tactics as extrajudicial and dangerous” (The Cable, Nov 1, 2023). But on June 8, 2024, the same commission raided a nightclub in Akure, which sparked human rights outcry. The reports of the incident said, “The EFCC’s commando-style raid of nightclubs in Akure, where over 50 youths were arrested, including a groom-to-be, drew sharp criticism from human rights activists and observers. The use of tear gas and force was described as a “violation of human dignity and abuse of operational powers” (Daily Post, June 9, 2024).

    While many were wondering the reason why EFCC would go against itself, the worst happened again at Awka in January 2025. On the 17th of January 2025, there was a report that said, “Awka Midnight Operation Turned Deadly.”

    It also said, “The EFCC came under fire after a midnight raid in Awka, Anambra State, led to the accidental shooting of an EFCC operative, Aminu Salisu, despite the commission’s November 2023 internal directive banning night raids. Civil society and legal advocates condemned the operation as reckless and unlawful” (Punch, Jan 17, 2025).

    The midnight raid didn’t stop there. On the 2nd of May, 2025, EFCC also raided different houses at midnight at Premier Layout, Enugu, where over 30 young persons were arrested and interrogated.

    What annoys many both in Nigeria and the global world is that the commission is aware of some extant laws such as Section 37 of the 1999 Constitution of Nigeria, Section 144(1) of the Administration of Criminal Justice Act (ACJA) 2015, Section 37 of the Evidence Act 2011, Section 34 of the 1999 Constitution of Nigeria, African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights (Ratification and Enforcement) Act, which all stipulated both the rights of law enforcement agencies/commissions and that of the citizens, yet they always flaunt them. Why a commission established by law manages to disobey the law or use the law as a sword instead of a shield is what Nigerians and the global world need to know.

    However, questions that any progressive-minded Nigerian would always ask are: why is EFCC going against itself? Who are they serving? Are they actually living up to the expectations or doing otherwise? How do Nigerians see them? What do Nigerians feel about their work?

    The answers to these questions would help our lawmakers and notable Nigerians to know whether the commission is still necessary or should outrightly be disbanded.

  • End Weaponized Governance – By Oseloka H. Obaze

    End Weaponized Governance – By Oseloka H. Obaze

    “Power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely,” is a cliché which might have lost its instructive value in contemporary governance.  This is more so, as some serving national leaders are exhibiting their true colours; while masking as democrats.  “Power reveals who a leader is.”   As evinced in some countries, we’ve witnessed blurred definitional lines between democratic leaders and unmasked autocratic leaders. Arguably, integrity or corruption is habitual default for power wielders.

    Nigeria confronts a national crisis and a peacetime existential threat. Governance has been extremely ethnified and weaponized.  Of that, there is no debate, despite expedient rationalizations. Happenings in Nigeria are dreadfully peculiar. The situation needs to be remedied urgently. In whole or in parts, Nigeria is in deep trouble. As such, there can be no conscientious objectors to the rescue mission, which must start now.

    Northern Nigeria is a mess. There is insecurity, poverty, communal conflicts, and food crisis in the three zones of the monolithic North, where banditry, insurgency and ungoverned spaces are also rife. The disappearance of the hides and skins industries, the groundnut pyramids, renowned textiles and tin ore industries, and now, the farms that were erstwhile national food basket were not orchestrated by outsiders. Kano once produced canned Jollof rice and egusi soup. Not anymore! It’s incumbent on the Northern leaders past and present to accept responsibility for such expansive crisis. Remediation will start with Northern leaders accepting their fault. Their blame game is defeatist.

    South-Eastern Nigeria is in a morass; and fraught with insecurity, criminality and a bested mindset. Its commerce suffers immeasurably.  Its industries have collapsed or moved to safer climes. Her financial capital, clout and culture have taken flight and are now domiciled outside the zone. The incumbent governors are all too knowing, to heed counsel or show humility.  They rule, but hardly govern. They have not managed indigenous recidivism well. They seem averse to joint-ventures and working cohesively in the interest of the zone. The moneybags from the zone contribute vicariously to the present impasse.  They tend to equate personal wellbeing and purchased security to collective wellbeing and collective security.  That disposition is most insidious. The zone is literarily deserted. It’s now a charnel house –a necropolis– where only the courageous return only to bury their dead.

    The South-South zone, suffers from leadership schizophrenia. Unarguably, the richest of the seven political zones, it is blighted by environmental despoilment and mired in underdevelopment. Their past leaders frittered away their commonwealth while chasing elusive power at the centre. The citizens are neither allowed to enjoy their rightful oil wealth or to peaceably govern themselves. The zone is collectively worse off for it. Their mercenaries masking as key stakeholders, are neither good leaders nor good citizens.

    South-Western Nigeria is now in-charge of national leadership. It suffers from insularity complex. Most regrettably, their understanding of national leadership bona fides, credentials and focus, negates the core leadership values and vision of Obafemi Awolowo and the inherent pragmatism that guided Olusegun Obasanjo to lead Nigeria, as a soldier and then as a civilian president. The present South-Western-led national government has weaponized governance as never before. The utmost danger is inherent in the prevailing delusional pretenses and deafening silence from that zone.  The road to perdition has never been so apparent.

    The Tinubu-Shettima government has been in office for two years. During that period, we have watched the Nigerian federation mentally, physically and progressively fractionize, as equity and national unity were without any caution thrown to the winds. Evidently, those who contrived the APC tag-team sold Nigerians a dummy. Acceptably, the atrocious eight years of President Muhammadu Buhari were foundational to the present governance rut and retrogression. But Nigerians can’t forget that President Bola Ahmed Tinubu had promised that he would continue where Buhari stopped. In that regard, he has kept faith.

    Ironically, the select coterie of roguish cohorts and beneficiaries of the present Malgovernance, who emanate from the seven political zones, pretend that all is well. It can’t be so. Let’s speak truth to power before its way too late.

    Right now, Nigeria ticks off well on the list of indices of bad governance, notably: deception, corruption, insecurity, illiberalism, iniquitous policies, criminality, incapacitated police force, ineffective legislature and judiciary, absence of checks and balances and utter disregard for the rule of law. Nigeria has been calculatedly plunged into a debt peonage. Nationwide, most of our youths are not in employment, education or training.

    Our urban agglomerations are increasingly decrepit and burdened by rural migration and unemployment pressures. This, like grazing areas has become sources of inter-communal internecine strife. The discontent and disenfranchisement of the national population is pronounced and humongous.  APC’s promise of “renewed hope” is proscriptive and has come to naught. Certainly, there can be no part two to that promise.

    As is routine, we have entered yet another cyclical season when strange political bedfellows pally around.  They do so supposedly on non-partisan basis and in the name of alliances. But individual or primordial interests and staying politically relevant is their raison d’être.  Yet, there are universal nation-building and national interest issues that are not being proactively addressed. If Nigeria implodes, we all lose. Somalia and Libya’s fate will be child’s play. The regional and geo-strategic implications will be immense. A failed Nigeria would also be a self-fulfilling prophecy.

    Nigeria needs bold nation-building and redemptive initiatives.  If by 2027 we don’t succeed in changing the present APC leadership and government constitutionally, with a view to putting Nigeria back on the trajectory of good governance, we may not have a country thereafter.

    Under our present circumstances, from 2027 going forward requires a fit-for-purpose nationalistic leader; who is elected through a process bereft of traditional emotionalisms and based on equity. He or she will need to be supported by our various ethnicities, and a support team of erstwhile rivals for Nigeria to be governed purposefully and equitably. The mixed political configuration of South Africa’s present government is a good example. Therefore, we must constitutionally bring an end the APC government, which like no other before -military or civilian- has effectively weaponized governance to the detriment of the national population. The task won’t easy: but it’s a doable national imperative.

    Nigeria has its fractured history. But it is a multiparty democracy, not a one-party state. As such, it can ill-afford to remain the extremely fractured nation it has become.  The choice of where we go from here is clear.  The path we toe eventually will depend on hard choices. As a federated nation, we must either choose to be parochial and myopic, or sufficiently bold to seize the moment and remain one country.

    As to purpose, it remains unclear if it is indifference or incompetence that drives Tinubu’s administration lackluster performance that is running Nigeria to the ground. But this much is clear: purpose has no expiry date. For that singular reason, it’s time to end this weaponized governance. There must be an endpoint to this “insanity that decays the wise.”

    ————-

    Obaze is MD/CEO, Selonnes Consult – a policy, governance and management consulting firm in Awka.

  • Theft as a National Enterprise

    Theft as a National Enterprise

    By Abdul Mahmud

    A 20-year-old housewife, Fatima Abdullahi, was docked before a Sharia Court. Her offence? Stealing foodstuff and N250,000 from her employer. The Sharia Court sits in Kano. The Sharia law will take its course. She is already shamed. The punishment for her crime is visible in the Qur’an. But, her trial will not conform to the international standards of fairness. Her guilt, unprotected by power because she is powerless as a nobody. Her desperation for freedom will be public.  She will be punished. As punishment for theft, the Court will order that her hands be cut off, consistent with the injunction of political Sharia in the north. She will weep on being sentenced.

    Elsewhere, in the cool corridors of air-conditioned offices, many thieves are stealing too. But they steal big. Call up the names on the register of big time [alleged] thieves. Ahmed Idris, former Accountant-General of the Federation, who allegedly stole N109 billion. His successor, Anamekwe Nwabuoku, is also on trial. He is accused of stealing N1.96 billion. Godwin Emefiele, former Governor of the Central Bank, is facing a catalogue of corruption charges. Contracts were awarded without process. Billions vanished. The national vault became his playground.

    Yet, for all the noise, how many of them wear handcuffs?

    Ahmed Idris is no mere man of numbers. He is a title-holder of the Daura Emirate. But not just any title-holder. Wait for it. His honorific bears a haunting irony. He is the Ajiyan Hausa, the Emirate’s symbolic custodian of its savings. The deposit. The purse. A title meant to evoke trust, restraint, stewardship, and to strengthen bond. Yet, here lies the bitter contradiction of our times: the keeper of the Emirate’s deposit is the [alleged] national vault plunderer. The hand, now entrusted to protect the granary of the Emirate, even if symbolic, is the very hand that [allegedly] emptied our country’s treasury. His title now reads like a cruel jest, a ceremonial mockery of the very values it was meant to honour. In saner societies, symbolism is sacred. In our country, it is a satire.

    There lies the paradox. The rich steal to reign; to show off and to rub their stolen wealth on the faces of honest citizens. The poor steal to eat. Though my late friend and playwright, Professor Tunde Fatunde, captured it in a different way in his biting satire, “Oga Na Tief Man” – suggesting in a way that it is only our bosses that steal. It is now clear that everyone – the rich and the poor – steals. Everybody steals. The gatekeeper steals. The messenger steals. The fuel attendant cheats you at the pump. The tailor adds money. Elders, the protectors of local mores, are land grabbers. Go to Benin City. A monarch who is apparently the king of boys now walks the Bedford Heights to the US jailhouse for wire fraud. The pastor lies. The imam collects bribes. Everyone wants something that is not theirs. This is how Fela described it in his song, Authority Stealing: “somebody don take something wey belong to another person”.

    Theft is now the national enterprise.

    It is the oil that greases every wheel. The high and mighty steal with pens and policies. Ordinary citizens steal with tricks and shortcuts. They call it “hussle”. The civil servant inflates contracts. The market woman hoards tomatoes. The customs officer under-declares imports. The voter sells his vote. The lawmaker buys it. And round our country goes in a merry-go-round of mutual theft. The oga steals the budget. The servant steals the change. The policeman collects bribes. The politician diverts funds. The civil servant “chops small.” No one is innocent. No one is shocked. Everyone expects to steal, or be stolen from. The tragedy is that citizens now call it normal.

    What began as elite corruption has trickled down. Or maybe it was always there. The difference is the scale. The rich steal in billions. The poor steal in hundreds. But both steal all the same. And both feel justified. “If I no move am, another person go move am.” Moving becomes another euphemism for theft. That is the logic. That is the rot. The consequences are clear. First, it kills trust. Who can you trust? Not the police. Not the pastor. Not the elder. Not the local chief. Not the courtiers. Not the teacher. Not the politician. Not even your neighbour. Everyone is out for themselves. Second, it kills hope. Why work hard when you can “hussle”? Why become honest when dishonesty is rewarded? Why play by the rules when the rulebook is torn? Third, it kills progress. The money meant for roads disappears. The funds for hospitals are embezzled. Schools rot. Power fails. Infrastructure decays. Our country borrows to pay salaries. Our country borrows to steal. The national debt grows. But the citizens remain poor.

    The moral collapse is total. There was once a time when shame restrained men. A time when elders frowned at corruption. When integrity mattered. When public office was an honour. Today, the thief is a role model. The looter is a chief. The bigger the loot, the louder the title. In our country, today, titles are no longer honours earned by virtue, but ornaments acquired through vice. My Etsako provenance offers one of the loudest of such titles: Oku Omolo – The sea never dries. It is meant to evoke abundance, resilience, and an endless wellspring of generosity. But in the hands of the corrupt, it has become the euphemism for bottomless theft. A celebration of plunder disguised as prosperity.

    Here, the deeper the theft, the grander the welcome. The thief returns home not in shame, but in splendour. Drums beat. Praise singers chant. Clerics pray. The community gathers, not to ask questions; but to ask for favours. No one remembers how the well was filled. Only that it overflows.

    Thus, a nation drowns in stolen waters while hailing the men who fetched them. How did our country get here? Slowly. Steadily. First, citizens excused the first thief. Then they praised him. Then they emulated him. Now, citizens encourage their children to steal. To cheat. To manipulate. They call it survival. But it is the death of the soul, of the country. Achebe said it best. A paraphrase of the late Irish patron-poet, W.B. Yeats’s “things fall apart” in his poem, The Second Coming: “The things that held us together have given way.” The moral straps of our country have snapped. Our values have collapsed. Citizens no longer know right from wrong. The house has fallen. As Karl Maier puts it: “This house has fallen”.

    But not all is lost. Citizens can still rebuild the country. But first, they must tell themselves the truth. Stealing is stealing. Whether by the gatekeeper or the governor. Whether by the clerk or the commissioner. Whether by the mechanic or the minister. Whether by Fatima or Emefiele.

    Our country and its citizens must stop decorating thieves. They must stop giving them awards. They must stop singing for them. They must stop inviting them to churches and mosques. They must stop calling them “destiny helpers.” They are criminals. Not heroes. The judiciary must act in accordance with its role. No if. The courts must bite. Not just the weak. Not just the powerless. But the high and mighty too. Justice must be blind. The law must not see pockets or positions. Only truth. The police must reform. Too many officers are gatekeepers of corruption. Roadblocks have become toll gates on our country’s highways. Bail is never free. The law is up for sale. That must end.

    Religious institutions must cleanse their altars. Too many thieves denn in the pulpits. Too many pastors preach prosperity without integrity. Too many imams pray for thieves. Religion must return to its core: truth, justice, righteousness. The civil society must rise and be active again. Too many NGOs are now fronts for corruption. Too many activists have become consultants to crooks. The media must shine the light. Not dine with darkness. Too many journalists now feast on brown envelopes. The pen must return to its calling; to expose, not  excuse. And citizens must resist. They must say no. No to vote buying. No to stolen mandates. No to stolen futures. They must reject rice-for-votes, stomach-infrastructure  politics. They must vote conscience, not stomach.

    Yes, all of this is hard;  but, it is necessary. Our country and its citizens must start small. One honest act at a time. One brave whistleblower at a time. One principled and active citizen at a time. That is how countries are rebuilt. Our country must raise a new generation. A generation that sees public office as stewardship. Not an Automated Teller Machine. A generation that understands that wealth without work is theft. That leadership without sacrifice is fraud. That power without purpose is poison. Our country must change the story of itself. From “Oga na tief man” to “Oga na servant.” From “everybody dey thief” to “some of us still dey stand clean.” From “na so Naija be” to “na so we go change Naija for good”. Our country is not cursed. Our country is corrupt. Our country is not poor. Our country is poorly managed. Ours is not the absence of wealth. It is the abundance of thieves.

    I fathom no illusion here. If Fatima Abdullahi must face justice, then so must the Ahmed Idrises and Emefieles. If the petty thief must be jailed, then the economic saboteur must be punished. The arc of the moral universe must bend toward justice for the big and small thieves and for our country. This house has fallen. But it can be rebuilt. Brick by brick. Truth by truth. One honest citizen at a time. That is the only hope. That is the only path forward to redemption.

    “Oga na tief man”.

    But so are the ordinary citizens who turn blind eyes to the thievery around them.

  • Enugu: Two Years of Mbah’s Obsession with Building Infrastructure

    Enugu: Two Years of Mbah’s Obsession with Building Infrastructure

    By Uche Anichukwu

    When Dr. Peter Mbah unveiled his manifesto at the Peter Mbah Law Auditorium of the Godfrey Okoye University, Enugu, on October 13, 2022, many were quick to point out what they felt were typographical errors in the document. Among the assumed typos were his promise to construct 10,000km of roads in four to eight years, restore public water to Enugu city in 180 days, move the state from 58 per cent poverty index to zero per cent poverty headcount, and grow the state’s economy from $4.4 billion to $30bn GDP also in four to eight years. Frankly, even among his campaign team were his genuine supporters, who often wondered if their candidate was not overpromising, given the economic crunch plummeted oil proceeds that had also whittled down receipts from Federation Account.

    Two years after he was sworn in as governor, pessimism and anguish have been overcome by joy and hope. The conversation has shifted from “He is promising too much,” to “He is doing too much at a time.”

    When he rejigged the 2023 Appropriation Law (Budget) upon assumption of office, providing for the construction and reconstruction of 71 urban roads in the state capital and 10 interstate roads, people thought it was what is called “Initial gra-gra” (initial show of muscle/seriousness) in local parlance, which Nigerians have become used to. But to their surprise, by his first anniversary, he had completed and commissioned all the 71 urban roads.

    Before they could digest it, Governor Mbah had presented the 2024 budget estimates where he not only showed a radical devotion to capital projects but also redefined budgeting in Nigeria. Before his administration, Enugu State’s total budget hovered around N100bn and N120bn with capital expenditure of about N30bn, representing a capital expenditure to budget ratio of about 25 to 35 per cent. But in his first full year budget (2024 Appropriation Law), which was a record N521.5bn, he devoted N414.3bn to Capital Expenditure (representing 79 per cent of the budget) and N107.2 billion (representing 21 per cent of the budget) to Recurrent Expenditure. This gained several editorial comments by leading national dailies.

    Yet again, he took it a notch higher in another record-breaking N971bn 2025 Appropriation Law. The budget has N837.9bn (86 per cent of the budget) earmarked for Capital Expenditure, while Recurrent Expenditure got N133.1bn (just 14 per cent of the entire budget). This radical departure is unprecedented here in Nigeria. The result is that today, Enugu has become a huge construction site with over 800km of roads already in the bag. Apart from the already completed aforementioned 71 urban roads and other additions that brought them to 90, the initial 10 rural and inter local government/state roads are progressing greatly. He equally flagged off the construction of additional 141 urban and 20 gateway roads in October 2024.

    These roads are equally strategic. For instance, with the 40km Owo-Ubahu-Amankanu-Ikem Road, people travelling from Ebonyi, Cross Rivers, and some parts of Enugu do not need to travel all the way to 9th Mile Corner to get to Obollo Afor, as it would serve as a gateway to the Northern region. The 43.7km Penoks-Abakpa Nike-Ugwogo-Nike-Opi Nsukka Road with streetlights will reduce travel time, address whatever is left of insecurity on that road, and help grow the economy. The ongoing dualisation of the 22km Enugu-Abakaliki federal road will solve the agony of gridlock and travel time to Abakaliki and reduce travel time between both capital cities.

    In the education sector, the administration is constructing 260 Smart Green Schools, 30 of which were already completed by December 2024 and commissioned by President Bola Tinubu during his official visit to the state in January. Because Mbah believes that “a nation cannot develop beyond the quality of its educational system and human capital,” the Smart Green Schools represent a quotum leap that places emphasis on Experiential Learning, a hands-on learning approach where individuals gain knowledge and skills through direct experience and reflection. The administration is also constructing a Science, Technical and Vocational Schools, STVCS, in each of the eight Federal Constituencies. The one situated at Government Technical College, Enugu is virtually ready.

    According to the Executive Secretary, Enugu State Primary Healthcare Development Agency, Dr. Ifeyinwa Anih-Osheku, the administration inherited a total of 557 Primary Healthcare Centres (PHCs) out of which 457 (85 per cent) needed a total reconstruction or major renovation. Consequently, the administration is constructing a Type 2 PHC in each of the 260 wards. Every PHC is furnished with modern equipment, powered by renewable energy, and has quarters for health workers to 24-hour service.

    Understanding that security is at the heart of any progress, the Mbah Administration constructed what has been adjudged the biggest and most sophisticated Command and Control Centre in the part of Africa. The hi-tech security infrastructure is greatly responsible for the well attested improvement of security in the state. It is linked by fibre optic cables to AI-enabled, thermal cameras that are capable of facial and plate number recognition.These cameras were installed across the metropolis and in the state for full surveillance. There are also over 150 vehicles equipped with the same quality of cameras. They are manned by the Distress Response Squad (DRS), a specialised police unit.

    In the tourism sector, he has already completed the 5,000-seater International Conference Centre, ICC, which was abandoned in its skeletal form and stripped since the initiator, former governor, Chimaroke Nnamani, left office in 2007. Mbah wants to bring 3 million visitors to the state each year and also reposition Enugu as the conferencing capital of Africa. So, he understood the need to quickly complete it. It was commissioned by President Tinubu in January.

    Again, he understands the connection between making Enugu an aviation hub (he has already procured three aircraft for a start) and making Enugu a conference capital. Consequently, he is building a 350-room 5-star hotel at the ICC that will be ready in a few months. The long-abandoned Hotel Presidential, which became a grazing field for cows and rendezvous for criminals, is about 90 per cent completed.

    He has also constructed five modern transport terminals at Holy Ghost, Nsukka, Gariki, and Abakpa Nike, ready for commissioning. Furthermore, he has equally procured 200 CNG buses and 2,000 city taxis that will be launched very shortly.

    At the same time, work is ongoing, fast, at the nearly 10,000-hectre New Enugu City, which construction he flagged off in October 2024. A smart city, it will host some of the tallest skyscrapers in Africa.

    An elderly woman was travelling to the township in a lorry (Gwongwolo) in those good old days. Older people would recall that passengers usually sat in rows of thick planks facing the rear. She saw a Volkswagen Beetle speeding up to the lorry and wondered how the little “motor” thought it could overtake the big lorry. But the Beetle did. She then screamed in wonderment that if this little ‘motor’ could overtake the big lorry at this age, then it would probably be flying when it grows up.

    With nearly 2,000 ongoing and completed projects across the 260 political wards of Enugu State, Ndi Enugu see and discuss Mbah as a project freak, who is obsessed with building infrastructure. So, if Ndi Enugu danced in frenzy at Okpara Square on May 29th when they trouped out to felicitate the governor during his second anniversary, it is because they know that if Mbah could do this much in just two years, then the sky would be the state’s starting point in the next six years. It would rival Dubai, and its economy would rank among the top economies in Africa. That is the power of vision!

    Happy second anniversary, His Excellency, Dr. Peter Ndubuisi Mbah, our own Mohammed bin Rashid Al Maktoum.

    Anichukwu is Governor Peter Mbah’s media aide

  • Special Op-Ed: The Future of Democracy in West Africa

    Special Op-Ed: The Future of Democracy in West Africa

    By Abdul Mahmud

    The democratic experiment in West Africa, once heralded as a beacon of postcolonial hope and civic renewal, is now teetering on the edge of collapse. A sub-region praised for its cautious embrace of multiparty systems, free press, and constitutional governance is increasingly defined by military coups, rampant kleptocracy, eroding civil liberties, and deepening economic despair. These are not the birth pangs of a fledgling democracy but the death throes of a failed experiment. West Africa stands at a historic crossroads, where the question is no longer whether democracy can thrive, but whether it can survive at all.

    Nearly thirty-five years have passed since the Commonwealth’s Harare Declaration lifted its banner of hope over the African continent, proclaiming a vision of democratic renewal and participatory governance. A year earlier, the Arusha Conference,  which adopted the African Charter on Popular Participation, emphasised the fact that it is the absence of democracy that is at the core  of Africa’s development crisis. Yet, today, that vision lies in ruins, abandoned in some places, and in others, so hollowed out that it survives only as a ritual of empty gestures, while states lie prostrate at the lower rungs of underdevelopment. The democratic struggles it once inspired, borne on the backs of ordinary citizens yearning for dignity and voice, have withered under the weight of betrayal. Where democracy has not vanished entirely, it has been vulgarised, reduced to a decorative fiction, stripped of its emancipatory substance. It now serves, in many quarters, not as a bulwark of freedom but as a tool of domination: a revisionist enterprise, co-opted by political elites and the bourgeois establishment, who wield its symbols to sanctify their power. What citizens are witnessing is the appropriation of democratic legitimacy to uphold values, interests, and practices that bear no resemblance to the democratic ideal. A point that the late Nigerian thinker, Claude Ake, gave profound clarity to in his book, ‘The Feasibility of Democracy in Africa’. To Ake, this emptying out of democracy and the conversion of its contents into means that legitimise deeply anti-democratic ends repudiate the very representative essence of the demos by “appropriating democratic legitimacy for political values, interests and practices that are no way democratic”. The vocabulary of this pre-eminent thinker still speaks to the truth today, now that all of democracy but its soul has been exiled by the ‘New West African democrats’ who continue to trivialise the demos. Hear Ake: “It is no wonder that democracy is in crisis today, even as we celebrate what we perceive as the triumphant march of democracy to every part of the world. What looks like thetriumph of democracy is actually the other side of its trivialization, its domestication to the point in which it can be embraced by power elites all over the world because it is too tame to threaten them”.

    A Subregion in Democratic Regress

    The optimism of the 1990s, when multiparty elections and civilian rule swept across West Africa, has given way to widespread disillusionment. Countries such as Nigeria, Ghana, Senegal, and Côte d’Ivoire once held promise as democratic exemplars. Today, even these nations are plagued by election-related violence, judicial manipulation, or the dangers of judicial selectorate as my friend, Professor Chidi Odinkalu, described it in his new book, ‘The Selectorate: When Judges Topple the People’, and the shrinking civic space. More worrying is the recurrence of military coups in Mali, Guinea, Burkina Faso, and Niger between 2020 and 2023. These coups are not isolated events but symptoms of deeper structural decay.

    In Mali, the military seized power in August 2020, citing the failures of President Ibrahim Boubacar Keita to tackle corruption and insecurity. The coup was initially welcomed by citizens fatigued by poor governance. However, the military soon reneged on its promise of a swift civilian transition. A second coup occurred in May 2021, consolidating Colonel Assimi Goita’s control. Rather than restoring order, Mali slipped into deeper instability, with elections repeatedly postponed and the military accepting the support of foreign mercenaries. Guinea followed in September 2021 with Colonel Mamady Doumbouya overthrowing President Alpha Conde, who had controversially amended the constitution to secure a third term. Doumbouya framed the coup as a corrective, promising to restore democracy. Yet, more than two years on, Guinea remains under military rule. The roadmap to civilian transition is murky, while political repression and arbitrary detentions have intensified. Burkina Faso endured two coups in 2022. The first in January ousted President Roch Marc Christian Kabore, blamed for failing to stem jihadist violence. In September, Captain Ibrahim Traore deposed the interim leader, citing the same security concerns. Under Traore, civil liberties have deteriorated further, political parties have been suspended, and there is no clear pathway to elections. The military has offered stability in name only. Niger’s 2023 coup, led by General Abdourahamane Tchiani, shocked observers who viewed the country as a bulwark of democracy. President Mohammed Bazoum had made strides in strengthening institutions. However, internal divisions, elite infighting, and perceptions of foreign interference created fertile ground for military takeover. The junta dissolved the constitution, suspended democratic institutions, and embarked on a campaign of repression. Côte d’Ivoire offers a revealing glimpse into the duplicitous face of West African politics; a coin with two indistinguishable sides, where the democratic mask conceals the autocratic impulse. On one side lies the semblance of civilian rule, dressed in the regalia of constitutionalism; on the other, the creeping shadows of kleptocracy, vanishing liberties, and economic disarray, evoking the atmosphere of a military regime without the fatigue of fatigues. Democracy here is not lived, it is poorly performed. President Alassane Ouattara’s manipulation of the Ivorien Constitution to secure a controversial third term mirrored the hubris of Guinea’s Alpha Conde, revealing a pattern of civilian rulers who clothe their ambitions in legalism while defiling the spirit of constitutional rule. In recent days, the air in Côte d’Ivoire has grown heavy with uncertainty, as news of an attempted coup spread through the virtual world. What remains is not a republic in motion; but a state, caught in the quicksand of its contradictions, teetering between the theatre of democracy and the spectre of military reckoning.

    These coups reflect a broader pattern: failed governance by civilian elites has bred popular disenchantment, creating opportunities for military adventurism. But the return of the military has not yielded better governance. Instead, it has deepened authoritarianism and prolonged instability.

    The Erosion of Human Rights

    Alongside democratic regression is a stark rollback of human rights across the subregion. Freedoms of expression, assembly, and association, indicators of democratic health, are under sustained attacks. In Nigeria, the 2020 #EndSARS protests against police brutality ended in bloodshed when security forces opened fire on peaceful demonstrators at the Lekki Toll Gate. The government denied responsibility, and no meaningful accountability followed. Journalists are regularly harassed, and repressive laws such as the Cybercrime Act are used to silence dissent. In Guinea, both Conde’s administration and the current military regime have used state violence to crush opposition. Civil society actors, journalists, and political leaders face harassment, arrest, and exile. The promised return to constitutional rule remains elusive. Mali’s junta has restricted press freedom, expelled critical journalists, and banned opposition gatherings. In Burkina Faso, military authorities have suspended political parties, limited media access, and detained civil society leaders. Across the subregion, repression has replaced reform.

    Economic Despair and Social Breakdown

    At the core of West Africa’s democratic decline lies deep economic malaise. The postcolonial promise of development and prosperity remains largely unfulfilled. Instead, inequality, unemployment, and poverty have worsened.

    Nigeria, Africa’s largest economy, remains a paradox of wealth and want. Despite vast oil reserves, over 133 million Nigerians live in multidimensional poverty. Corruption, subsidy mismanagement, and weak institutions have undermined development. Inflation and naira devaluation have eroded purchasing power, deepening hardship. Ghana, once seen as a model of economic progress, experienced its worst crisis in 2022. Public debt ballooned, inflation surged beyond 50%, and the cedi collapsed. The government was forced to seek an IMF bailout, sparking public protests and eroding trust in political leadership. In Mali, Burkina Faso, and Niger, economic despair is even more acute. Chronic underdevelopment, youth unemployment, and poor infrastructure have left large swathes of the population vulnerable. Extremist groups exploit these conditions, offering money and security in exchange for allegiance. Where governments fail, armed groups fill the vacuum.

    A demographic explosion compounds the crisis. West Africa’s population is young, with over 60% under the age of 25. These youths face bleak futures, limited opportunities, and systemic neglect. Many migrate through perilous routes or join insurgencies in search of identity and income. Democracy, in their eyes, is a failed promise. No wonder many celebrate the military interregnum in many of these states.

    The Postcolonial Crisis of the State

    The modern West African state is rooted in colonial legacy. Designed for control rather than inclusion, many states have failed to evolve into functional democracies. Centralised authority, exclusionary politics, and ethnic fragmentation continue to define governance. Despite being a federation, Nigeria’s federal government dominates resource allocation and policy direction. This fuels agitation for regional autonomy and ethnic nationalism. In Mali and Burkina Faso, state failure in peripheral regions has facilitated jihadist insurgencies. Legal and constitutional frameworks are routinely subverted to entrench incumbents. Alpha Conde and Alassane Quattara’s respective manipulation of Guinea and Cote d’Ivoire’s constitutions for third terms are cases in point. In Senegal, fears of similar manipulation by President Macky Sall sparked widespread unrest.

    The state is often treated as a personal estate by ruling elites. Public offices are used to distribute patronage and consolidate power, not to serve the people. This distortion of the social contract erodes legitimacy and fosters conflict.

    Irresponsible Elites and the Collapse of Moral Leadership

    The greatest tragedy of West African democracy is the crass irresponsibility of its elites. Rather than serving as custodians of the public good, they have become predators who pillage state resources, rig elections, and undermine institutions. This elite failure has deep roots. The early post-independence years saw idealistic nationalists replaced by authoritarian rulers. In Nigeria, successive military regimes institutionalised corruption. In Togo, the Eyadema dynasty presided over decades of kleptocracy. Even in supposedly democratic Ghana and Senegal, political elites have been implicated in grand corruption.

    Today, political parties function less as vehicles for ideology and more as platforms for personal gain. Elections are marred by vote-buying, violence, and judicial compromise. Civil service appointments are based on loyalty, not merit. Infrastructure contracts are inflated, mismanaged, or abandoned. Citizens increasingly view their leaders with cynicism. The distinction between civilian politicians and military juntas is blurring. Both are seen as looters: one in uniform, the other in traditional garb. This perception delegitimises democracy and fuels instability.

    Military Coups: A False Messiah

    The resurgence of military coups raises a fundamental question: does the future of West Africa lie in military adventurism? For many citizens, coups appear to offer an escape from corrupt civilian rule. But this is a dangerous illusion. Historically, military regimes in Africa have not delivered good governance. From Samuel Doe in Liberia to Ibrahim Babangida in Nigeria, juntas have often been more repressive, corrupt, and incompetent than the civilians they replaced. In today’s West Africa, the pattern is repeating. Mali’s junta has failed to restore security or hold elections. Burkina Faso is sliding deeper into authoritarianism. Guinea’s military rulers are consolidating power rather than transitioning. Niger’s junta has alienated international partners and curtailed civil liberties.

    Military regimes lack legitimacy, institutional competence, and long-term vision. They thrive on coercion, not consensus. Their rise reflects democratic failure, but they are not a solution.

    Reclaiming the Future: Toward Democratic Renewal

    The future of West Africa must be anchored in a rediscovery of democracy, not as a mere slogan mouthed in conference halls or election campaigns, but as a lived ethic, a tapestry of values, norms, and institutions that give dignity to governance and voice to the governed. In my estimation, true democracy must transcend procedural rituals; it must inhabit the daily experience of justice, equity, and accountability. Some scholars have rightly questioned the transplantation of Western liberal democracy onto African soil, arguing that its values often fail to resonate with indigenous political cultures. Yet, the deeper tragedy lies not in the foreignness of these borrowed ideals, but in the corrosive alternatives offered by the subregion’s governing elites. What they seek to elevate in place of liberal democracy is not a grounded African ethos of communal justice or participatory governance; but a toxic blend of patronage, authoritarianism, and impunity, masquerading as cultural authenticity. In truth, it is not foreign values that imperil democracy in West Africa, but the cynical deployment of culture to sanctify corruption and silence dissent.

    All of this demands not just sober reflections, but an urgent reimagining of the kind of reforms that can anchor democratisation in the subregion on solid ground; a terra firma both firm and fertile. These reforms must reach across multiple frontiers, whether political, economic, cultural, or institutional and lay the foundation for a democratic ethos that is not only resilient, but resonant with the lived realities and aspirations of West African peoples. Admittedly, one might argue that democratisation in the subregion has either yet to begin in any substantive sense or, more starkly, that it never truly began at all. What passed for democratic transition was often a facade, an illusion draped in electoral rituals, beneath which old authoritarian impulses and exclusionary politics continued to thrive. As a starter, electoral integrity must be restored through credible, transparent, and inclusive processes. Independent electoral commissions should be protected from political interference, vote counting must be transparent, and peaceful transitions of power must become the norm. Equally, judicial independence must be defended to act as a counterweight to executive overreach and electoral injustice. The rule of law must also be upheld. Anti-corruption agencies should be strengthened and insulated from the whims of political power. Whistleblowers deserve protection, citizens must have access to public information, and civic education should be prioritised to build democratic literacy from the grassroots. There must be a renewed push for economic justice. Inclusive development that prioritises youth employment, equitable resource distribution, and basic service delivery is essential. States must be seen to work. They must deliver education, healthcare, and infrastructure efficiently and with integrity, if faith in democratic systems is to be rebuilt. Civil society must be free to organise, criticise, and innovate. Journalists, activists, and ordinary citizens must be protected in their efforts to hold power to account. A robust, independent media is essential not only as a check on government excesses but also as a forum for public dialogue.

    Finally, the role of regional and international actors remains crucial. The African Union and ECOWAS must go beyond mere rhetoric and enforce clear, consistent standards for democratic governance. Foreign partners, too, must rethink their engagements while prioritising good governance over security partnerships that often entrench authoritarianism.

    Ballots, Not Bullets

    West Africa stands at a critical juncture. The democratic experiment is faltering under the weight of elite irresponsibility, economic despair, and postcolonial contradictions. The military’s return is not a solution, it is a symptom of failure. But the future is not predetermined. Citizens across the region have shown courage and resilience from the streets of Lagos during #EndSARS to the protests in Dakar and Conakry. The desire for dignity, justice, and accountable governance endures. Democracy must be rebuilt from the ground up. It must be anchored in values, sustained by institutions, and defended by citizens. The ballot box, not the barrel of a gun, must shape West Africa’s destiny.

    Let me return to where I began.

    The so-called democratic experiment in West Africa, once celebrated as a beacon of postcolonial hope and civic renewal, is now precariously balanced on the precipice of collapse. The subregion, once lauded for its tentative but promising embrace of multiparty politics, a free press, and constitutional rule, has become increasingly synonymous with military takeovers, unchecked kleptocracy, the erosion of civil liberties, and an ever-deepening economic gloom.

    The questions endure: will West Africa learn from the burdens of its past and reclaim the promise of democracy that has never taken root in the subregion, nor did it ever present itself as a promise in the first place? Where lies the future of democracy in West Africa?

    But, first, before I proffer some an answer, let me provide some clarity and a summary on the falsehood passed off as democracy in the subregion.

    Democracy endures as a luminous ideal and a contested practice. As an idea, it remains unsullied in the subregion: a timeless aspiration towards liberty, justice, and the collective shaping of destiny. It has not failed. Nor has it become dated in the face of modern challenges. Rather, it is the practice of democracy presented as civil rule that has faltered under the weight of elite manipulation and institutional decay. Across the subregion, the promise of democracy is habitually masked by a ruling class deeply threatened and unsettled by its demands. True democracy thrives on transparency, accountability, and popular participation; principles that unsettle those who govern through patronage, impunity, and inherited power. In their hands, civil rule is often emptied of democratic substance and refashioned into a facade: a hollow performance that mimics the rituals of democratic life while evading its responsibilities. This distortion breeds disillusionment. When citizens, long betrayed by civilian governments masquerading as democracies, look to the military as saviours, it is not out of ideological conviction but out of existential despair. The coups in Mali, Guinea, Niger, Chad, and Burkina Faso are not triumphs of military doctrine, but desperate responses to a system so degraded that even jackboots appear preferable to Gucci men’s horsebit leather loafers. In such circumstances, military rule is not embraced as a solution, but tolerated as a pragmatic reprieve, if not a dangerous reaction to the farce of governance presented in democratic clothing. To conflate civil rule with democracy is to mistake the mask for the face in a manner that makes it impossible to escape from the reality that the false mask imposes. And to blame democracy based on the failures of its counterfeit is to indict the innocent for the crimes of the guilty. What the subregion suffers is not the death of democracy, but its betrayal by those who swear oaths to defend it.

    Now, I return to the answer, even if briefly.

    The answer, which appears implicit already, lie not in the silence of the barracks, but in the awakened hearts of citizens.

  • 2027 and the Opposition’s Test

    2027 and the Opposition’s Test

    By Abdul Mahmud 

    A few days ago, opposition leaders gathered in Abuja. They called it a national political summit. Their mission was clear: to take back political power in 2027. In speeches laced with urgency and ambition, they signaled the start of a political war to win the hearts of the electorates. At the heart of this new resolve is the burning question: can the opposition really defeat Bola Tinubu’s ruling APC? On the surface, the resolve looks like a noble dream, and the mere push of love for power. But, dreams alone don’t win elections; or as my friend, Ayisha Osori, puts it more poignantly in her book, ‘Love Does Not Win Elections’. Power doesn’t fall into laps. It is taken through strategy, sacrifices, and unity. The opposition coalition must face the uncomfortable truths. They must ask themselves: are we truly ready? Or we are merely taking the citizens who are desperate to escape Tinubu’s nightmare for the ride?

    Right now, the opposition space is fragmented. The PDP, the biggest opposition party, is a shadow of its former self. Its governors bicker in public. Others inside it wear the party’s colours on their sleeves, yet their hearts beat the drums of power inside the ruling party where their personal selfish interests whisper louder than party loyalty and allegiance. Its presidential candidate in the 2023 election appears not to have a foothold on the party. The Labour Party, once the surprise of the last election, is struggling with identity and cohesion. Peter Obi remains popular, but his party lacks depth. Enter Sowore who has consistently presented himself as an insurgent at the gates of neoliberal power; and whose party, the African Action Congress, AAC , conflates radical struggles with petit bourgeois liberalism, and with ill-fitting rhetoric. In seeking to marry the fire of radicalism with bourgeois politics, Sowore mistakes the fact that he is operating within a bourgeois neoliberal political order for a radical political environment, with the presence of revolutionary conditions. He has to operate inside the coalition, posing an objective modernity that is rooted in emancipatory politics or what the British sociologist, Anthony Giddens, describes as “engagements concerned with the liberation from inequality”. Though, internal rifts and ego battles often threaten to reduce opposition coalition to a personal cult rather than a national political force organising for power, how the opposition coalition deals with the rifts over personal ambitions matters in aggregating unity within itself.

    There is a fundamental truth that I must lay bare here – one so central that it ought to serve as the rallying cry for all aggrieved citizens: that within the opposition coalition lies the last viable platform upon which their collective aspirations can be realised. It is not merely a political alignment, but a covenant of common purpose, the big tent under which the dispossessed, the disillusioned, and the determined can find both voice and vision. The orchestrated gale of defections, engineered from the commanding heights of power in our country, has done more than disrupt party lines; it has helped drain the political swamp, clarifying the landscape into a vivid binary: on one side, those content to watch the nation stagger deeper into the mire of misery and ruin; on the other, those resolved to staunch the bleeding and set the republic on the path of recovery and rebirth. This is no longer a matter of mere politics; it is a moral referendum. A battle between light and darkness, justice and impunity, hope and despair. The choice is stark, and the hour is upon us. I am in that hour and have chosen to be on the side of the opposition coalition.

    But, there is this familiar story worth retelling here that the opposition coalition can learn from elsewhere. One that mirrors the fate of Cambodia’s now-defunct opposition. In Cambodia, the ruling Cambodian People’s Party, CPP, led by Hun Sen, waged a quiet and effective war of attrition. It didn’t need to defeat the Cambodia National Rescue Party (CNRP) at the polls. It simply dismantled it. First, by using the courts to de-legitimise it. Then by orchestrating defections and stripping the party of its core. In 2017, the CNRP was dissolved by the Supreme Court. By then, its leaders were in exile or in prison. The party was gone. And so was any real challenge to Hun Sen’s rule. The opposition faces a similar threat. A sinister ministerial order to ‘close the shop’ dangles like a noose around the neck of the PDP, whose national secretariat in Abuja now sits under lock and key – sealed off for alleged non-payment of ground rent. Yet, beneath this ministerial veil of legalism lies the darker pretext: a crude attempt to slam-dunk the party out of existence, not through the ballot, but through the backdoor of state power wielded as vendetta. Also, APC is slowly drawing away influential voices. Defections are gathering momentum. Every defection erodes credibility. It tells voters that the opposition cannot protect or reward loyalty. And as it stands, neither PDP nor Labour has a coherent strategy to prevent further haemorrhage.

    But, defections are just one part of the challenge. The larger problem lies in the opposition’s inability to define itself. What does it stand for? Why should our citizens trust it? Removing Tinubu is not a vision. Citizens want to know what comes after. They want to know how the opposition coalition will end hunger, grow jobs, rebuild institutions, secure lives and secure their country. It is this clarity that is still missing. Though it isn’t late yet to pose and give clarity to all of this.

    The contrast with Senegal is instructive. In 2024, the Senegalese opposition did what many believed was impossible. It defeated the ruling elite and produced the country’s youngest president. This wasn’t luck. It was the result of years of tireless grassroots organising, unity, and ideological clarity. Even when their main figure, Ousmane Sonko, was jailed, the movement endured. The opposition didn’t collapse under pressure. Instead, it grew stronger. It didn’t focus on personalities. It focused on change. That discipline, that resilience, is what turned a protest movement into a governing force. The opposition coalition and its supporters and promoters continue to make elections about individuals. The Atiku-Obi rift cost the opposition dearly in 2023. Instead of presenting a united front, they split the base. Kwankwaso’s ambitions added another fracture. The APC didn’t win because it was popular. It won because the division allowed it to work and game the electoral process in a fraudulent way.

    And now, with 2027 on the horizon, that same lack of coordination is creeping back in. The Abuja summit was the first step. I welcome it, warts and all. But, walking the talk becomes cheap, a mirage, when unity of purpose is absent. Walking the talk begins with shared sacrifices. Someone must be willing to step aside. As Ousmane Sonko did in Senegal last year. Someone must lead the charge. As Diomaye Faye did. Others must fall in line. That’s the nature of coalition politics.

    Coalitions aren’t new to Africa. In Ghana, the National Democratic Congress has built enduring strength through consistent messaging and grassroots work. In Kenya, Raila Odinga’s ability to unify various political camps, despite internal contradictions, shows that coalition-building can deliver momentum. Our opposition coalition leaders must stop seeing each other as rivals and start behaving like allies. They need a memoranda of understandings. On consensus. On ambition. Not the ones signed in hotels but those signed in action. The practical roadmaps with timelines, benchmarks, and compromises. The opposition coalition must also overcome another major weakness: its detachment from the masses. Our citizens want change, but they don’t want elite quarrels. They want food, security, dignity, and a country that works for all. The Senegalese opposition understood this. They mobilised students, unions, and rural farmers. They protested. They forced the state to listen. The opposition coalition is still too focused on media sound bites and elite meetings.

    There’s also a lesson from the Philippines. Rodrigo Duterte didn’t come from the traditional elite. He spoke plainly. He sounded like the people. He wasn’t polished, but he was relatable. That authenticity gave him power. Behind him was a campaign machine that knew how to touch nerves. His supporters built online armies. They controlled narratives. They sold hope. He defeated an entrenched political dynasty because he knew how to connect with ordinary people. The opposition coalition should pay close attention. In 2023, the opposition tasted the power of social media. But it wasn’t enough. Opposition coalition doesn’t win elections alone online. It wins them in the cities, towns, villages, and hamlets. It wins them by convincing the citizens and build the coalition of the aggrieved around them. It wins them by building trust, one handshake with the citizens at a time. And it must organise, not just mobilise. Mobilisation is what serious opposition coalition does before elections. Organisation is what it builds between elections. The opposition coalition needs ward structures, data, election monitors, logistics hubs. It needs to recruit and train volunteers. It needs to know every local issue, every polling unit, and every INEC officer to deliver the message: rig and die. It doesn’t win elections by outrage; it wins by converting citizens’ outrage into protective bulwarks against rigging. It wins by planning.

    Time is not on the side of the opposition coalition. The APC has the tools of incumbency. It will play the ethnic card. Tinubu will argue that it’s still the South’s turn. The opposition must be ready to counter that narrative with a national message. It must present a pan-Nigerian ticket that appeals across the north and the south, across religion, across class. It must also confront the demons within. Ego, ethnicity, and ambition are the three poisons destroying the opposition. Too many leaders think they are saviours. They are unwilling to compromise. They want to lead, even if it means losing. That mindset must change. Politics is not about personal fulfilment. It’s about service. Those who cannot accept this should step aside.

    Ambition will also be a test, with eyes are on 2027. Atiku may run again. Obi is interested. Kwankwaso wants relevance. But there is only one ticket. Unless these men can sit together, agree on terms, and stick with them, the ruling party will coast to victory again. More importantly, the opposition coalition must also take defections seriously. Loyalty must be rewarded. Structures must be protected. There should be clear rules. Crossing to the ruling party shouldn’t be treated as a mere political mischief. It should be political treason. Voters must be made to see defectors as traitors, not heroes. That requires narrative control. It requires discipline. It requires a clear sense of identity.

    And that leads to the final point: the battle of stories. Every election is a contest of narratives. The opposition coalition must invest in storytelling. They must define the 2027 election before APC does. They must control the message. Not just in English, but in Hausa, Yoruba, Igbo, and Pidgin. They must craft a story of hope and urgency. A story that says: 2027 is about saving our country. They must tell this story in markets, at bus stops, on radio, on TikTok, Twitter, Instagram and Facebook. They must reach the old and the young. They must inspire, but also instruct. They must be clear about what they will do differently. And they must say it often.

    History shows that opposition coalitions don’t win by accident. They win because they plan, they unite, they learn. Cambodia shows what happens when an opposition coalition doesn’t protect its base. Senegal shows what’s possible when it does. The Philippines shows how one man with a message can change the game. The opposition coalition still has time. But not much. If it starts now, I mean truly starts now, it can build something powerful. If not, the summit in Abuja will be just another jamboree. And 2027 will be a repeat of 2023- with stolen ballots and all that jazz.

    Our citizens are waiting, watchful, weary, but not without hope. The youths, disillusioned by empty rhetoric, now demand substance and not slogans. The old, mindful of the hourglass, yearn to walk hand-in-hand with the young, to pass on a country that works to the next generation before the final summons of death arrives. In this twilight of despair and flickers of hope, the opposition coalition stands at the cusp of possibility. It can give shape to these longings, give breath to a new covenant.

    I believe it, with the quiet urgency of faith.

  • A Moment of Reckoning: PDP at the Crossroads of Renewal or Ruin – By Mosimiloluwa Koye-Ladele

    A Moment of Reckoning: PDP at the Crossroads of Renewal or Ruin – By Mosimiloluwa Koye-Ladele

    The news is everywhere. In recent months, we’ve witnessed a wave of defections from the crisis-ridden People’s Democratic Party (PDP) and Labour Party (LP) to the ruling All Progressives Congress (APC). Some of both parties’ most prominent and long-standing figures have jumped ship, accelerating the party’s descent into instability. BAT, never one to miss a moment of political theatre, described it as a natural consequence. After all, who can blame passengers for fleeing a sinking vessel?

    But is this truly the end of the PDP or could it be the beginning of its rebirth?

    This is a defining moment. If the PDP has any strategic thinkers left within its ranks, now is the time to act. The party’s past is a heavy burden, weighed down by years of misgovernance and a public perception of incompetence. But moments of crisis often offer the clearest path to transformation. This is an opportunity to completely reimagine the PDP—its soul, its identity, and its place in Nigeria’s future.

    Let’s be clear: APC is no bastion of virtue. The legacy of the Buhari administration left Nigeria with lost years and dashed hopes. Many of those now defecting into APC bring their baggage with them. What we’re witnessing might not be a victory for APC, but a moment to cleanse the PDP of political dead weight. Rather than chasing after defectors, the PDP could seize this as an opportunity to rebuild from first principles.

    Imagine a bold declaration, not just a rebrand, but a political resurrection. What if PDP paused its presidential ambitions for 2027 and instead focused solely on rebuilding its foundations? What if it embarked on a nationwide project of values-driven renewal, one anchored not by slogans, but by integrity, vision, and inclusion? To signal true intent, the party could reach out to credible, unimpeachable Nigerians to join the party – not to lure them into politics with empty titles, but to seek their input in defining a new political architecture grounded in capacity, competence, and character. These are people who cannot be bought and any serious attempt to align with such figures must come with a clear and compelling proposition, a national vision that demands seriousness, sacrifice, and long-term thinking.

    In addition to engaging these credible individuals, the PDP must also embrace strategic alliances with other parties that stand for something meaningful. To mount a credible opposition against an APC fortified by incumbency and political machinery, the PDP needs to do it with others. True strength will lie in pulling together like-minded forces, not through superficial political pacts, but through coalitions born of shared purpose and bold national ambition. The Labour Party (LP), despite its internal wranglings, must not shut its eyes to this possibility. Neither should other emerging parties committed to democratic renewal. Nigeria needs more than individual parties posturing for power, it needs a united front for real change.

    Lastly, the PDP must also intentionally create space for the next generation. Young, intelligent, pan-Nigerian, street intelligent, forward thinking and charismatic individuals, male and female must be groomed now for leadership. Nigerians are watching. They are tired of recycled politicians and discredited elites. They are searching for leaders with integrity, energy, and emotional intelligence, people who can unite a fractured country.

    If the PDP fails to take this road, what then remains? Will it stagger into the next elections fractured and uninspiring? Will it continue bleeding relevance, becoming little more than a fading memory of what once was?

    The choice is theirs to make. But history shows that parties, like nations, are either renewed, or replaced.

    I’ll let them decide.

    Mosimiloluwa is the President of the Association for Good Government and Governance and can be reached at koyesimi@gmail.com