A Federal High Court in Abuja yesterday adjourned the trial of the Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB) leader, Nnamdi Kanu, till November 10.
Trial Justice Binta Nyako fixed the date after the office of the Attorney-General of the Federation (AGF) informed the court that it had filed a fresh seven-count charge against Kanu.
After the fresh counts were read to him, Kanu pleaded not guilty. He also challenged the competence of the charge and the court’s jurisdiction to try the case in a fresh application.
Kanu, it was gathered, requested to be transferred to the Kuje Correctional Centre in the Federal Capital Territory (FCT). However, Justice Nyako declined and directed that three people of his choice should be allowed to visit him in the DSS custody on Thursdays.
The amended charge include secession threat, description of President Mohammadu Buhari as a terrorist and idiot; being member of IPOB and inciting IPOB members to kill security operatives.
Kanu had been granted bail in April 2017 on health grounds. But, he skipped bail after flouting some of the conditions given to him by the court.
IPOB was subsequently declared a terrorist group by the Federal Government.
He was arrested and returned to Nigeria from Kenya on June 20. On June 28 when he was taken to court by the DSS for his treason trial to continue, Justice Nyako ordered that he should be remanded in DSS custody.
On July 26 when the case was to restart, the DSS failed to produce him.
Kanu, dressed in grey Fendi attire, entered the court around 10am, guarded by the DSS.
Shortly after the proceedings, his lawyers took pictures with him.
His lead counsel, Ifeanyi Ejiofor, said he was challenging the court’s jurisdiction on the grounds that the alleged offences were committed in the United Kingdom and not in Nigeria.
Before his arrival, there was pandemonium at the court’s entrance as lawyers clashed with DSS personnel for refusing them access into the premises.
Court officials were made to stand in queue and searched before being allowed into the court premises.
Some reporters who were allowed in did not go beyond the ground floor of the five-floor court building. The proceedings were held on the fifth floor.
Some security agents said they were instructed to prevent media coverage of the proceedings.
Prominent Nigerians, including a former Anambra State Governor Chukwuemeka Ezeife; leader of the Movement for the Actualisation of the Sovereign State of Biafra (MASSOB), Chief Ralph Uwazurike, and Senator Ifeanyi Uba (Anambra South) were also prevented from witnessing the proceedings.
Eziefe, who arrived at the court with Ejiofor, lamented that he could not see the IPOB leader after being left in the sun for hours.
But, the former governor, who heads the Ohanaeze Ndigbo team monitoring the trial, said the development would herald the birth of a new Nigeria.
Uba frowned at the way he was treated, arguing that as a senator, he ought to be allowed to witness the case.
An activist, Deji Adeyanju, said: “At least, even under military rule, journalists would be given access to the courts. Members of the general public could also access the court. But today (yesterday) the reverse is the case. It is most unfortunate and unbelievable that this is supposed to be a democracy.
Ohanaeze Ndigbo said Kanu’s appearance in court amounted to the beginning of victory.
“This is one step forward in Ohanaeze’s determined moves towards ensuring that the Afara Ukwu Prince is set free in no distant time,” its spokesman, Chiedozie Ogbonnia, said in a statement.
The organisation urged youths in the Southeast to show restraints, prudence, and maturity in their legitimate demands for equity, justice, and fairness.
The statement reads in part: “The diplomatic engagements by Ohanaeze Ndigbo Worldwide has apparently yielded a positive result as the Federal Government has through the DSS bowed to the overwhelming demands of Ndigbo by producing Kanu in court.
“We are unrelenting in our resolve to ensure that the government toes the path of wisdom by conceding to the proposal for ‘Dialogue and Alternative Dispute Resolution’ which will ensure the unconditional freedom of Mazi Kanu and all members of IPOB detained across Nigeria.”
Demanding unconditional release of Kanu, IPOB said he has not “committed any crime to deserve persecution”
It also asked the Federal Government to prepare a date for a referendum on Biafra.
In a statement by its Media and Publicity Secretary, Emma Powerful, IPOB commended those that played various roles in ensuring that Kanu was produced in court.
He said: “We wish to commend all the honorable men and women, including renowned groups in the world who lent their voices in advising Federal Government and the DSS to produce our leader Nnamdi Kanu today (yesterday) in court.
“Those who played a role in producing our leader in court have done Nigeria and DSS some great service. Thank God, they listened to wise counsel and did not fail to produce our leader in court today.
“Now that he appeared in court today, and Biafran can confirm that he is alive, Nigeria must do the needful and release him unconditionally.
Read Also: Umuahia, Aba deserted as IPOB’s Kanu appears in court
“Nigeria government should prepare a date for the referendum on Biafra. Those who want to sabotage Biafra freedom should wait for referendum date.”
After the adjournment, Kanu’s supporters, who were also barred from the court premises burst into solidarity songs.
An activist, Omoyele Sowore, was allegedly attacked by hoodlums.
He was standing outside the court premises when the hoodlums swooped on him.
DSS operatives warned the attackers to back off.
Sowore explained why he was in the court.
He said: “I am here to check the registry because for a while I have not been charged to court. I need to know about my treason case.
“Also, I am here to witness the trial of my friend, Nnamdi Kanu. The courtroom is incomplete, except the public observers watch and if it is a secrete trial, the public must know it‘s a secrete trial. You cannot have a secret trial in a public courtroom.”
A shop, fully stocked with provisions, cosmetics, and household items, was yesterday morning set ablaze by hoodlums enforcing another sit-at-home order in Enugu State.
The hoodlums also set ablaze a container truck conveying goods to Abakaliki, Ebonyi State in another at Eke Obinagu.
The driver of the truck belonging to a popular transport company was said to have escaped unhurt.
IPOB had threatened a one-month sit-at-home beginning from yesterday if Kanu was not produced in court.
The threat also made residents of Ebonyi, Abia, Anambra, and Imo states stay indoors to avoid being attacked by enforcers of the order.
The owner of the shop in Ekeagu was said to have opened in defiance of the order when a group of youths arrived and set fire to it.
Eyewitnesses said: “They dragged the shop owner out while one of them went to their vehicle to get petrol with which they set the shop ablaze. They also ensured that the fire totally gutted the shop and its contents”
Banks, parks, schools major roads, and streets, including fuel stations, remained under lock and key in all the five Southeast states.
Nnamdi Kanu’s trial: Security operatives bar Sowore from courtroom
Security operatives have barred activist Omoyele Sowore from accessing the courtroom to witness the trial of Nnamdi Kanu.
Sowore who was dressed in traditional Isi-agu attire was told to go back by operatives of the Department of State Services and the Nigerian Police Force.
Sowore who spoke to journalists said he was at the court for a number of reasons.
He said, “I am here to check the registry because for a while I have not been charged to court, I need to know about my treason case.
Also I am here to witness the trial of my friend, Nnamdi Kanu, the court is a public space and the public should not be barred from accessing the courtroom.
“People have the right to self-determination, Nigeria has not worked and will never work. So Nnamdi Kanu is not wrong and his trial should not be in secret.”
“Security operatives have consistently failed to do their jobs and now you see them harassing journalists and lawyers.”
The PUNCH reports that journalists and lawyers who were present at the High Court in Abuja were barred from the court premises by security operatives.
The Movement for the Actualisation of the Sovereign State of Biafra (MASSOB) has warned the Federal Government not to fail to produce leader of the Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB), Nnamdi Kanu, in court tomorrow.
It said Kanu’s absence in court would bring devastating destruction to Nigeria as “it will be a proof of evidence that he has been killed in DSS detention cage. Nigeria government should know what it means and the follow up reaction if Nnamdi Kanu is denied his physical appearance in the court.”
The group’s leader, Uchenna Madu, in a statement, yesterday, said MASSOB is fully backing the civil disobedience call by IPOB directing people in the South East to sit-at-home any day Kanu would be brought to court.
“In the spirit of Biafranism and brotherhood among pro-Biafra agitators, we have declared full support for the call for civil disobedience and total economic and social lockdown against Nigeria state for the release of Mazi Nnamdi Kanu.
USA companies need customer service reps to work from home, hourly pay in $13 per hour, must have a quiet environment to work, internet access.Click here to apply .
“In the spirit of collaboration and for Biafra sake, MASSOB will engage positively in every step, programme and activity that will effect the release of Mazi Nnamdi Kanu.
“We support other moves that draw Biafra closer to actualization. We shall continue to collaborate and partner with every positive move and step that will effect the release of our other comrades in different Nigeria prisons mostly in Awka and Onitsha detention camps.”
Madu explained that the call for closure of markets, public/private motor parks, schools and other public business premises was voluntary, adding that it is a mark of respect and love for Igbo land and the detained IPOB leader.
“MASSOB, IPOB and other pro-Biafra groups will not molest, compel or intimidate anybody to observe the stay-at-home exercise as all our members shall stay indoors, there shall be no physical demonstration, street march, procession or any other public functions tomorrow in Biafra land.”
Condemning the heavy presence of security forces especially the military in parts of South East since Monday this week, MASSOB said those were signs of military jittery, fear and cowardice.
Madu reasoned that the panic created by the presence of soldiers will assist immensely and positively on the people to comply with the call for sit-at-home.
MASSOB noted that the security agents were complementing and justifying the Biafra struggle and therefore, categorically demanded the unconditional release of the IPOB leader.
“No amount of security intimidation, mesmerization, killings, detention, oppression, incarceration etc will ever stop the will power of an indigenous people for self-determination,” MASSOB stated.
Interview: When Nnamdi Kanu was first arrested, his release was engineered by Ohaneze -Ohaneze Spokesperson
Hon. Chidozie Alex Ogbonnia is the National Publicity Secretary of Ohaneze Ndigbo Worldwide. He was also a former member of the Enugu House of Assembly. The Pacesetter Frontier Magazine had a chat with him in his residence, few days after President Muhammadu Buhari’s visit to Imo state, on burning issues. Dateline: September 16, 2021.
What are the core objectives of Ohaneze Ndigbo?
Ohaneze Ndi Igbo is the umbrella body for Ndigbo, we have a lot of Igbo organizations, Ohaneze is the umbrella body. Ohaneze Ndi Igbo is the apex, sociocultural body for the interest of the Ndigbo wherever they are. As the name suggests, every Igbo person, man or woman, anywhere in the world is a member of Ohaneze Ndi Igbo. It’s not exclusive to anybody, any Igbo person is welcome to be a member of Ohaneze Ndi Igbo. The objective is basically for the furthering of the Igbo interests, Ohaneze takes an overall view of the social, cultural, economic and political dynamics of the country and influences Ndigbo on how to go about it. But ultimately, for the interests of Ndigbo.
Chief Alex Ogbonnia
President Buhari recently visited Imo state and by implication, the South East. Was that visit necessary? What was the essence?
In all fairness the President, Muhammadu Buhari made a statement in the past that those who supported him in the election would get 95% while those that didn’t would get 5%. He didn’t hide it and so far, it appeared that he had been following that policy in his appointments. His appointments are so lopsided against the people of the South East, Nigeria, which hence propels the agitations against what you may call injustice or marginalization. People in the South East are not happy with what is happening. Therefore, they are not happy with anyone that identifies with the President.
However, in public life one thing that is important is Diplomacy. At some point, you will need to apply diplomacy. When Buhari said he was coming, we had two options; tell him not to come, or use his coming to open an entirely new vista of relationship, embrace him, tell him our problems, and Ohaneze chose the latter. He left with a few things. One, we complained to him about the injustice done against us. It’s there in the address by the National President of Ohaneze Ndigbo, Prof. George Obiozor. Ndigbo are interested in being a part of Nigeria, provided there is the value of justice, equity and fair play. Two, that Igbo youth agitators in various detention centers should be released. We let him know we are prepared to work with him if his attitude to us changes. A lot of other things were discussed. We had the opportunity to discuss things one on one with him.
We have been meeting with him in Abuja. If you look at the security structure of the country, from the IG of Police, to the Army, to Navy, to Customs, you wouldn’t find any person from the South East in the head of these bodies. It aggravates the thought process of the Igbo people. We are not fully represented in the national security architecture of the country. So far, there are certain ministries that are classified as Grade A ministries, like Works, Finance, Agriculture, Education, Power, etc., no Igbo is a minister of any Grade A ministry. And when you look at the allocation of public utilities, Ndigbo are not treated appropriately. The same thing with other political appointments of the kinds. All these propel the agitations we have among our people. Ohaneze has been trying to use her diplomatic dexterity to get something out, but it appeared the President was not listening to us. His visit to Owerri opened a new chapter of relationship we hope to explore. That’s our position on that.
It’s at least about six years since the President has been on the seat, that’s six years of the use of diplomacy to get him lean a bit to the South East in his policies and appointments for better political and structural inclusion, but nothing to show for it yet. What gives you the faith that this time would be different?
We are not saying that his coming to Imo has dramatically changed the relationship, but we have to believe there will be a change. No condition is ever permanent. We will continue to try, the worse is not trying at all. We will keep trying so that when we have exhausted this option, we will be fulfilled that we played our own side of the bargain. Ohaneze philosophy is that Nigeria is for all of us. Ohaneze does not give momentum to leaving Nigeria, that’s the point of divergence we have with IPOB. Our point of convergence is in agitation against marginalization. IPOB is interested in referendum and exiting the country, but Ohaneze is in interested in harnessing the resources and expenditure, and managing the people’s common wealth right. We are also interested in using the Ndigbo’ adventurism to explore the resources in other parts of the country. We realized that the frontier spirit of the Ndigbo is second to none in the entire Africa. I worked in ECOWAS Parliament, I had the opportunity to visit almost all the countries in West Africa, I discovered that Ndigbo are in control of, at least, the electronics market in almost all the West African countries. I went to South Africa, the same thing. The markets are controlled by mostly Ndigbo.
You go to Port Harcourt; in their markets you will be speaking Igbo because Ndigbo control the market. The same thing in Akwa Ibom and Calabar. In fact, in Calabar, they call cell phones Onye na-ekwu. Back then, Ndigbo were the ones that could easily own phones when GSM first came to the country, they would answer to calls on the phone with the phrase, Onye na-ekwu, so the Calabar people easily nicknamed cell phone Onye na-ekwu. That illustrates the magnitude of the Igbo presence in Calabar.
I lived in Kano, at least the Sabon Gari Market in Kano is 90% Igbo. The same thing as Sabon Gari, Sokoto, Zaria, Kaduna, and more. Ndigbo have a high level of properties, when you talk about the people with many properties in every corner of Nigeria. People from other parts of the country are not as willing as the Ndigbo to own properties outside their states or zones.
Ndigbo control the market economy of the country. When you have a budget of N20b in Kano, that budget comes to the market. No budget escapes the market. When it comes to the market, Ndigbo will grab it, in spare parts, in building materials and more. This is how it is. We want to maintain it, for our people to feel safe wherever they are in the country. We will develop our own place at our own pace. Not everyone understands these socioeconomic dynamics. When they gave a quit notice to Ndigbo in the North, we recorded about 14 million Ndigbo living in the North. They pleaded that they didn’t want to come home. They pleaded that they didn’t want to leave Nigeria. We are careful not to hurt the relationship because it will affect the over 14 million Ndigbo living in the North. That’s why we are opposed to hate speech. We are surrounded by other ethnic groups, giving them pejorative names or stereotypes is not to the advantage of Ndigbo scattered in every part of the country. Oje mba enwe ilo is the Igbo philosophy that insists that a traveler should not acquire enmity to himself. Ndigbo are travelers. If you are hurting the Northerners here, there are lots of Ndigbo living in the North that will bear the pain. This is why we should be careful. Ohaneze tries to manage the crisis because we seem to appreciate it more, we understand the diversity of Nigeria more, and that’s why we are careful the way we manage this crisis. If you go through history, you will discover that some countries made up of too many ethnic groups eventually broke up. Nigeria will ultimately break up, but this break up has to be carefully managed so that you don’t create unnecessary enemies, losses, and deaths. We can all do that amicably.
I have a friend in Ghana who is from Abia State. I visited him; he has a large compound in Ghana. I asked him why he built such large asset in another country, he told me he had no interest in coming back to Nigeria, that he wanted to be seen as an Igbo in Ghana. He was ready to be buried there. This is to show you that economy is the osmotic force driving social life, driving everything.
When you have the economic force, you become the osmotic force gravitating everyone to yourself. Ultimately, it is where you find your wellbeing that is your home. Ndigbo in Kano feel at home in Kano, they feel at home in Sokoto, in Kaduna, in Ghana and more. Ndigbo’ frontier spirit, adventurism, and traveling capacity is something we don’t play with. Oje mba enwe ilo should be the guiding philosophy. It is immodest to tell the Yoruba man that he’s not wise, to tell the Hausa man that he’s not wise, it’s not a good way to go. Instead, let them know we are friends, we are in their homes.
Talking about the need to remain in Nigeria as one, lately, there are more talks about Igbo presidency than there are talks about restructuring, why is it so? Perhaps one is more important than the other.
First, we don’t want to make restructuring, as it is, entirely an Igbo agenda. What we did instead was to have what we call Southern and Middle Belt Leadership Forum, led by Chief E. K. Clark. We realized that the South South region is clamoring for restructuring, just like the Middle Belt, the South West, and Ndigbo. All the people clamoring for restructuring, with common interests can put their interest together and put force to the center. Restructuring is no longer an Igbo thing.
When you look at the President, his body language, what he wants to achieve, his direction, then you look at politics to mean the act of the possible, then you will know how to move. Another part of leadership is that this present National Assembly are so complacent with the executive. Sometimes you don’t see the separation of power in action, you don’t see the checks and balances in action. If we had a well separated and working legislature, we would be able to send a bill and they will work on it through the legislative process, but it doesn’t appear to be so with our Senate President.
As regards Igbo Presidency, we are guided by the demand for equity and fairness. In July, 1998, I was a participant in a meeting that was held in NUC event center, Abuja, where the issue of power rotation was a major part of the discussion. Sen. Chuka Okadigbo was the spokesman for the South. It was resolved that there must be power rotation, but first that power must shift to the South. It was agreed that power must shift to the South after Gen. Abdulsalami Abubakar. And after that it should go back to the North, then continue to move that way. After President Obasanjo, it went to the North, President Yar’adua, then to President Jonathan, and now, President Buhari.
It’s now bound for the South again, and the only part of the South that has not got a shot at it yet is the South East. Equity demands that it should come to the South East. Chief Clark has made it clear that it has to be South East Igbo. That’s what equity and fair play means. If this is done, there won’t be any agitation among Ndigbo in Nigeria again, they will feel a sense of belonging.
It appears, according to IPOB and some Igbo masses, that there’s a conspiracy of silence amongst the Igbo elites on Nnamdi Kanu’s detention, except for the meeting of the NASS SE caucus members on September 15. Why’s that?
I am not sure of the elite you are talking about, as far as I am concerned, the highest elite in Igbo land is Ohaneze Ndi Igbo. We have contacted the best of our brains in law, and they are all ready to always appear in court to make sure that due process is followed and Nnamdi Kanu is released. It’s not a mechanical process, to simply say, “release Nnamdi Kanu!” No, there will be a judicial process to the effect of his release. We appointed Dr. Ezeife, a PhD holder in Law from Harvard for Nnamdi Kanu. I don’t know the other elite you are looking for. There’s no conspiracy of silence, we have been talking and working on this.
Since the re-arrest of Nnamdi Kanu, we have witnessed a lot of continued sit at home orders from his fellow ideologues, where do you think this will lead us?
Ohaneze Ndi Igbo is opposed to the sit at home order, it is not helping anyone. If we continue to destroy the things in the South East because of this, we will only attract mockery from the enemies. In the first place, you should never allow your enemies rejoice over you. The fact that others do not bat an eyelid over your sit at home calls for you to re-evaluate your position. And more importantly, you don’t face the barrel of the gun inwardly, you face it outwardly. Some boys masked themselves and destroyed a vehicle loaded with bread, then motorcycles and more. Now, by doing that, how does it hurt Buhari? The properties being destroyed are all owned by Ndigbo. It’s an outrageous paradox, and it doesn’t make sense to me. Maybe there may be a positive outcome, but it doesn’t make sense. Do you know how many adjournments the court will pronounce in this case?
The best thing is what Ohaneze is doing with the National Assembly, we have Sen. Abaribe, Sen. Ekweremadu and others. We work with them. Prof. Obiozor will not do all the things, but he has people to work with. When Nnamdi Kanu was first arrested, his release was engineered by Chief Nnia Nwodo. He called for nzuko umunna to go and see Nnamdi Kanu in detention then, the likes of Ferdinand Agu, Sen. Abaribe, Osita Chidoka, and others, about seven of them went to see him and reported back to Ohaneze. Ohaneze had a meeting with Sen. Ekweremadu and others in Ekweremadu’s house and it was resolved that Sen. Abaribe should take Nnamdi Kanu on bail. That was how he came out in the first place. Shortly after he came out, he came to thank us but in thanking us, he made some weird and strange statements. He said there wasn’t going to be an election in Anambra. Nnia Nwodo pointed out to him that Anambra had recorded tremendous socio-economic development in the Southeast and that anything that would disrupt that election would create problems for Ndigbo. Nwodo told him that there could be a state of emergency declared in Anambra, that could lead to the appointment of a non-igbo as an administrator of Anambra. Nnamdi tried to point out that by the provisions of the constitution, the Speaker of the House of Assembly would hold sway but Nwodo as a Lawyer reminded him of other provisions of the constitution to support his position, and Nnamdi finally understood. Nwodo also told him that since Anambra had, at the time conducted her primaries, he should identify one candidate and ask IPOB to support him. We also told him that he should keep his religion away from his struggle, since the dominant religion in the southeast was Christianity and that most spiritual leaders who played roles in his release might be hurt if he attempted to create a new religion in the southeast.
It is important to approach things in a certain way, so that you bring the maturity of the old and the impetuosity of the youth to blend into one another for a better success. The meeting point of these two would have brought us a better result than what we are seeing now. We need to respect our elders, say, like the Yorubas and the Hausas. Youths are important, but we must get it right. Down here, our youths seem to be attracted to anyone who curses and insults elders; they see that person as being courageous.
Biafra as-was, seemed progressive, the airstrip, ogbunigwe and more innovations that came with it. Do you think Biafra as-was is attainable now?
First, every Igbo person is Biafran. Every Yoruba is Oduduwa. Biafra is now an identity and a nomenclature. But to look at the geography of Biafra as in Akwa Ibom, Cross River and more, is unachievable. You are talking about what happened 50 years ago, what worked for your grandfather is not likely to work for you, the grandchildren. The world is not static, the world is dynamic. Bayelsa and others were willing to work with Biafra 50 years ago, they are not likely willing to work with Biafra 50 years later.
When you talk about Biafra as an entity here, you have to think about some limitations, like boundary protocol in the states around, like when you are crossing from Aba to Port Harcourt, from Obolo Afor to the North, etc. You have to decide which is better. And you must remember that we have over 300 ethnicities in Nigeria, all of them are complaining. Tell me which of them that are not complaining. No ethnic group in Nigeria is happy. Don’t make yourself a scapegoat, like I said, if things continue this way, everyone will eventually find their way. Countries like ours often eventually break up, the call for secession will get to a crescendo, what matters is, how. It has to be in a way that you don’t hurt the wellbeing of people.
When this call for secession gets to that crescendo you talked about, do you think it’s something restructuring can manage?
Yes, restructuring would help. Without restructuring, we will get to that point of no return. It is the most viable solution to this.
What’s Ohaneze’s stand on the Anti-open Grazing bill?
I congratulated the Enugu State Governor for signing the bill into law. I understand that the Governor of Abia State did the same. We encourage other governors to key into this philosophy. What we are saying is that the herder-farmer clash is not helping anybody. It causes chaos and sometimes deaths. Anything you identify as a source of problem is better removed. This is our justification for asking our governors to ban open grazing. We applaud those that have keyed into it, and we will continue to engage others to do the same.
As some parts of Enugu and Anambra are reported to have been deserted.
The planned sit-at-home ordered by the Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB) scheduled to commence today has split the pro-Biafra community.
The pro-Biafra group had penultimate week, in solidarity with its detained leader, Nnamdi Kanu, ordered a sit-at-home that would be observed every Monday throughout Igboland, until his trial would end.
While the organisation’s Media and Publicity Secretary, Emma Powerful, said there was no going back on it, a family member of the embattled leader of the group, Kanunta Kanu, said the exercise has been suspended due to ongoing National Examination Council (NECO) examination for junior secondary schools.
But Powerful, in a statement yesterday, said Kanu’s brother who issued the statement is not IPOB’s spokesman and therefore should be ignored.
“Kanu brother is not IPOB spokesperson and anybody who listens to that deceptive statement and obligated to such statement by coming out tomorrow (today) will get it hot.”
Powerful reiterated the directive is sacrosanct and will hold as scheduled from 6am to 6pm.
“The entire Biafraland will be locked down every Monday from 6am to 6pm beginning from today until our leader, Kanu, who was abducted in Kenya and brought back to Nigeria and locked up in Department of State Services (DSS) dungeon in clear violation of international laws, is freed.
“Consequently, there will be no movement throughout Biafra land on Mondays until our leader who is suffering for our freedom is released. This protest is peaceful but firm. Everybody is advised to stay indoors in total compliance,” he said.
But a statement by IPOB’s leader’s younger brother said a new date for the commencement of the sit-at-home order would be announced later.
Kanunta said having realised the academic deprivation the already marginalised Biafra students who entered for this year’s NECO would suffer, it decided to suspend the sit-at-home order to a later date, to allow the students take their examinations. He equally made it clear that allowing the sit-at-home to go ahead as earlier announced, in the face of the NECO examination, would amount to assisting enemies of Biafra to inflict more injuries on its children.
This came as Anambra and Abia governments warned workers, especially the civil servants and residents not to obey the sit-at-home directive.
Anambra Head of Service, Harry Udu, in a statement, yesterday, made it clear that any worker who failed to be on duty would face severe sanctions, including seizure of August salary and directed commissioners and permanent secretaries of various ministries to monitor compliance and report same accordingly.
“The government of Anambra State has directed that all workers in the state must attend to their duties today as failure to do so will result in severe sanctions, including loss of salary for August. “All commissioners and permanent secretaries are to monitor and report compliance. Give this information the widest publicity in your establishment,” the government said in the statement.
Similarly, Abia government asked residents to disregard the IPOB order. The government’s directive contained in a statement issued in Umuahia by Commissioner for Information, Okiyi Kalu, said adequate security had been provided to ensure safety of lives and property in all parts of the state.
He said it made no economic sense to order traders to sit at home, while they are struggling to fend for their families under COVID-19 and the attendant harsh economy.
He further warned that compelling the children to stay away from schools would be counter-productive and capable of retarding their progress academically.
The commissioner, however, noted that it would not compel anyone wishing to sit-at-home for any reason whatsoever not to do so.
“As citizens have freedom of movement under the extant constitution, we wish to strongly advice that nobody should also compel or enforce any sit-at-home order from any non-state actor. Doing so will not serve any known interest of the people of the state.”
Meanwhile, a resident of Nnewi in Anambra reached out to The Pacesetter Frontier Magazine correspondent stating that in Nnewi, cars are being destroyed this morning by IPOB. Abakpa and Agbani Road looks deserted as at the time of filing this report. More details as happenings unfold.
The planned sit-at-home ordered by the Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB) scheduled to have commenced tomorrow (Monday) has been suspended due to the just began National Examination Council (NECO) Exam for junior secondary schools.
A new date for the commencement of the sit-at-home order, IPOB said would be announced later.
The pro Biafra group had penultimate week, in what appeared to be in solidarity with it’s detained leader, Nnamdi Kanu, ordered for sit-at-home that would be observed every Monday throughout Igbo land, starting from August 9, until when his trial would end.
However, in a statement the IPOB leader’s younger brother, Kanunta Kanu said the group arrived at the decision, after listening to pleas from well meaning individuals and groups within and outside Biafra land that the order be suspended to allow students from Igbo land to participate in the NECO Exam.
“IPOB has listened to pleas from well-meaning individuals and groups within and outside Biafra land that we consider the fate of our children who will be involved in the NECO Exam and based on that, we decided to shift grounds over the sit-at-home order”.
The statement added that IPOB on its part, having realized the academic deprivation the already marginalized Biafra students who entered for this year’s NECO would suffer, decided to suspend the sit-at-home order to a later date, to allow the students take their exams.
Kanu equally made it clear that allowing the sit-at-home to go ahead as earlier announced, in the face of the NECO Exam would amount to assisting enemies of Biafra to inflict more injuries on her children.
“As a group fighting for the liberation of her people from oppression from her enemies, we realized that it would amount to assisting the said enemies to inflict more harm on our children if we do not suspend the sit-at-home order to allow Biafra students take their exams”.
While making it clear the sit-at-home order has not been cancelled, but only suspended for the sake of Biafra students taking this year’s NECO Exam, the statement called on all IPOB global family members and Biafrans at large to await further directives in this regard. (Sunnewsonline)
We’re supporting Nnamdi Kanu’s family, his rights sacrosanct: Abia Govt
Abia State Government is actively monitoring the situation with Mazi Nnamdi Kanu who is an indigene of the state and is currently under trial at a Federal High Court in Abuja, with a view to ensuring that his fundamental human rights, as enshrined in the Constitution of the Federal Republic, are respected.
We remain in touch with his family members, other relevant persons and institutions, and receive regular updates through them on the situation.
The Abia State Government is confident that the judiciary will ensure a free and manifestly fair trial for him and others as they remain innocent until proven guilty by a court of competent jurisdiction.
We therefore wish to call on all citizens and visitors to continue to be law abiding and avoid any act that might lead to a break down of law and order.
While Government will not compel anyone wishing to sit at home for any reason whatsoever not to do so, as citizens have freedom of movement under the extant Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, we wish to strongly advice that nobody should also compel or enforce any sit at home order from any non state actor as doing so does not serve any known interests of the people of the state.
Furthermore, compelling our children to stay away from school can only serve the interests of the yet to be properly identified persons who may not want to see us make progress as a people.
Similarly, our traders sitting at home at a time they need to work very hard to sustain their families and create wealth especially in this era of COVID-19 impacted global economy will obviously not serve any development interest of our hardworking citizens.
All law abiding citizens and visitors are therefore called upon to go about their normal businesses without fear of molestation as adequate security has been provided to ensure their safety.
Parents and guardians are also called upon to ensure that they monitor the activities of their children and wards with a view to ensuring that they do not engage in unlawful activities that will put them in harm’s way.
Thank you.
Chief John Okiyi Kalu
Honorable Commissioner for Information, Abia State
The trial of the leader of the proscribed Indigenous People of Biafra, Nnamdi Kanu, resumed at the Federal High Court Abuja on Monday without Kanu’s presence in court.
When the matter was called up, the prosecution counsel, M. B. Abubakar, informed the court that the matter was slated for hearing and that they were ready to continue.
Nnamdi Kanu’s lawyer, Ifeanyi Ejiofor, informed the court that there was a pending application before the court to transfer Kanu from the custody of the DSS to the correctional centre.
Justice Binta Nyako stated that the trial cannot continue in the absence of Kanu since he is not available to stand his trial.
Justice Nyako also called the DSS to produce the IPOB leader in court for trial.
The court adjourned to October 21, 2021, for continuation of hearing.
The Department of State Services has barred The PUNCH and some media organisations from covering the trial of the leader of the Indigenous People of Biafra, Nnamdi Kanu, as his trial continues today.
Also barred along with The PUNCH are The Guardian, Vanguard, Daily Trust, Tribune, Daily Sun, The Cable, and Daily Times, among others.
The media organisations the DSS accredited are Daily Post, ThisDay, Premium Times, The Nation, Daily Independent, The Herald, National Television Authority, Television Continental, African Independent Television and Channels Television.
The DSS did not give reasons for picking 10 media houses while barring others from covering the trial.
A call to the DSS spokesman, Dr Peter Afunnaya, rang out, while a text message sent to him on the action of the secret police had yet to be responded to as of the time of writing this report.
However, a Senior Advocate of Nigeria, Mike Ozekhome, who condemned the decision to prevent The PUNCH and other media organisations from covering the trial, said the position of the law was that every trial should be carried out in public and everyone was entitled to watch the proceedings.
He said, “Our legal system does not admit of secret trials. We are not a country of witches and wizards operating in a coven. For a trial to be free and fair, Section 36 of the constitution says it must be carried out openly and publicly. Banning some media houses from covering Nnamdi Kanu’s trial is not only a sin against Section 36 of the constitution, it also violently offends the provision of Section 22 of the same constitution which gives the media the right and responsibility to ensure that the provisions of Chapter Two of the constitution dealing with the fundamental objectives and directive principles of state policy are upheld and that the government is held accountable to the people of Nigeria.”
Speaking in a similar vein, Remi Olatubora (SAN) said preventing media organisations from performing their constitutional duty ran contrary to the right to freedom of expression as guaranteed under Chapter Four of the Nigerian Constitution.
Olatubora said, “It is a signal that we are now under a full dictatorship. One serious angle to the barring of a section of the media is whether the trial can still in those circumstances be regarded as trial in the public or a free and fair trial as required by the constitution.”
Also, Boma Alabi (SAN) said, “Generally speaking, the courtroom is a public space, everyone can come in.
“If it is a contentious trial that people can come in and disrupt proceedings, then the court will make arrangements to ensure that the proceedings are not disrupted. It is within the court’s right to do so.”
A Senior Advocate of Nigeria, Ifedayo Adedipe, also questioned the Federal Government’s motives in excluding The PUNCH, and some other national papers from Nnamdi Kanu’s trial.
He said, “It is obvious that The PUNCH has taken a stand against the oppressive nature of this regime and the government now sees the media house as an unfriendly organisation that they do not want to have anything to do with.
“The facts will speak for themselves, whether some newspapers are excluded or not. Nnamdi Kanu is expected to have a fair and open trial and preventing some media houses from being there will not do credit to the image of the government.
“I will advise The PUNCH and other newspapers to keep their heads up and not be discouraged by this government. Some of the issues usually raised by these newspapers are critical national issues. I believe that it is only people who are beneficiaries of nepotism that will say that this government is not oppressive or discriminatory.”
Just In- Nnamdi Kanu and Sunday Igboho’s Trial; All There is to Know.
Alao Abiodun
On Monday July 26, Nigerians will keenly follow the court proceedings and arraignment of two prominent separatist leaders – Nnamdi Kanu and Sunday Igboho.
Kanu is the leader of Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB) and founder of the Eastern Security Network (ESN), which agitates for a separate Biafran state for ethnic Igbos in southeast Nigeria.
Igboho is a Yoruba co-promoter of the idea of an Oduduwa Nation and a self-acclaimed defender of Yoruba territory against killer herdsmen in South West.
Igboho had led rallies across the South West, including Ibadan, Osogbo, Akure, Abeokuta, Ado Ekiti to sensitise and mobilise the people for his ‘Yoruba Nation’ agenda.
Kanu had been detained by the Federal Government after he was extradited a few weeks ago. Igboho was also arrested at Cardinal Bernardin International Airport, Cotonou Republic of Benin and detained at Brigade criminelle in Cotonou.
Here is a quick background on their arrest and other updates to catch-up with:
Sunday Igboho’s trial updates:
The Cour De’appal De Cotonou, Benin Republic, last week adjourned the hearing of the case of embattled Yoruba Nation agitator, Sunday Adeyemo aka Sunday Igboho, till Monday.
The Beninise court ruled Igboho’s wife, Ropo, should be released unconditionally as there were no charges against her.
The court, however, ruled that Igboho be remanded in police custody till Monday.
The two were arrested at the Cadjèhoun Airport in Cotonou last Monday while they tried to catch a flight to Germany.
Igboho was earlier declared wanted by the Department of State Services for allegedly stockpiling arms, an allegation he denied.
The lawyers handling the case reported after the proceedings that lgboho cannot be extradited to Nigeria for two reasons. According to him, they include: Contrary to insinuations, Nigeria and Benin have no Extradition Agreement.
Nnamdi Kanu’s trial updates:
Nnamdi Kanu will on Monday appear before Justice Binta Nyako-led Abuja Federal High Court for the continuation of his trial.
The case of treason involving Kanu was before the judge when the agitator fled the country in 2017.
Justice Nyako had granted Kanu bail after which he fled Nigeria to Europe. He was, however repatriated few weeks ago.
Kanu’s lawyer, Aloy Ejimakor, however, argued his client never jumped bail, stressing that the Nigerian government made him flee the country. His lead counsel, Ifeanyi Ejiofor, had disclosed that Kanu’s trial will continue as scheduled on Monday despite Federal High Court judges going on recess
Kanu was ordered to be remanded in the custody of the Department of State Security (DSS) while the case was adjourned till July 26.
He faces an 11-count charge of treason, treasonable felony, terrorism and illegal possession of firearms but there are indications that fresh charges may be filed against him when the trial resumes.
Supporters of the embattled leader are planning to flood the Court premises as a sign of solidarity during the trial.
The Southern Kaduna Peoples Union has carpeted the Federal Government over the arrest and detention of activists across the country.
The umbrella body of the Southern Kaduna people urged the government to deploy the same tactics adopted in the arrest of the leader of the Indigenous People of Biafra, Nnamdi Kanu, and Yoruba Nation activist, Sunday Adeyemo, aka Sunday Igboho, in tackling the rampaging bandits in the North.
SOKAPU’s National President, Jonathan Asake, stated this while addressing journalists in Kaduna on Thursday.
The SOKAPU leader also alleged that over 100 natives had so far been killed in communities in the Zango-Kataf Local Government Area of the state recently.
According to him, the government must stop the use of force on mere agitators, while pampering terrorists in the North.
Asake, a former House of Representatives member, said, “Again, this year, with the commencement of another rainy season, the onslaughts have resumed, which coincide with the period when our farming communities need to be on their farms.
“With particular reference are the recent attacks on communities in Zangon Kataf LGA, where no fewer than 100 persons have been massacred within seven days, 12 villages completely decimated and over 90 per cent of Atyap land deserted by inhabitants over fears of frightening uncertainties.
“It is sadly unbelievable that 10 days after these massacres and displacement in our communities from all observable indices, there appears to be a conspiracy of silence or a deliberate attempt by the government to downplay the severity of the atrocities and genocides being perpetrated by these attackers across our communities.”
Read Also
After six-hour hearing, Benin court releases Igboho’s wife, remands activist
It’s shocking govt is negotiating with bandits who shot down NAF aircraft but harassing Igboho for standing against killer herdsmen – Oduola, Ibarapa leader
[ICYMI] Igboho: Ilana Oodua releases manual for Yoruba nation agitation
On attacks and kidnapping in the North, Asake added, “We are convinced beyond doubt that the government has a capacity to combat these daredevil bandits, who have made life unbearable for our communities.
“If the government could lure the Benue militant, Terwase Akwaza, aka Gana, out of his hideout in September 2020, and later killed him; if they could trace Mazi Nnamdi Kanu to Kenya and blindfold him to Nigeria in June 2021; if they could trace Sunday Igboho to Cotonou and arrest him just a few days ago; and if they could smoke out the commander of the Eastern Security Network, Ikonso, and later kill him in April 2021, then, it clearly shows that the government has enough capacity to deal with the situation.
“We find it strange to explain how the government is unwilling to tackle banditry and kidnappings in the North, but at the same time hasty in deploying full intelligence and military force against southern and Middle Belt activists, who are engaged in one form of agitation, criminality or otherwise.
“Even when these bandits brought down an air force jet last Sunday, July 19, at the border between Zamafa and Kaduna states, thereby challenging the sovereignty of our country, the government has not shown enough action to tackle the dangers posed by bandits and insurgents, who have now acquired anti-aircraft launchers and sophisticated weapons.
“The survival, unity and progress of the Nigerian state are more threatened by the untamed atrocities of these northern bandit groups and armed Fulani herdsmen more than the actions of the Kanus, Igbohos and Terwases of the southern and Middle Belt regions.
Ohanaeze Ndigbo, yesterday, said the manner the Federal Government is handling the issues concerning leader of the Indigenous Peoples of Biafra (IPOB), Nnamdi Kanu, and his Yoruba Nation counterpart, Sunday Adeyemo (a.k.a Sunday Igboho), is akin to pursuing peace without justice.
It said the Nigeria security operatives has, in recent time, shown that they could bite, but urged that they devote similar zeal and energy in tackling the Boko Haram insurgents, marauding herdsmen and bandits in North East, North West and other parts of the country.
The apex Igbo organisation, in a statement by its spokesman, Alex Ogbonnia, flayed what it described as selective efficiency of the security operatives in handling the various cases.
Quoting the words of Pope John Paul II, Ohanaeze said that the only way for peace to reign in society is for justice to be seen to be served to all.
“We recall that Chief Sunday Igboho emerged in the scene because he could not endure the daily menace of the Fulani herdsmen in the Yoruba localities for a very long time. The herdsmen would kill, maim and rape women at random. All entreaties to the Presidency for a swift action against the AK-47 wielding herdsmen appeared to fall on deaf ears. Then, Igboho, in a patriotic heroic zeal, intervened to save the rural farmers, women and children from the daily menace of the herdsmen.
“The rate at which the herdsmen destroy farm crops, attack villages, kill the indigenes and forcefully occupy their ancestral lands is most callous, unconscionable and condemnable. This is where the intervention of the presidency is most needed; and, of course, the Igboho paradox.
“Ohanaeze Ndigbo Worldwide, led by Ambassador Professor George Obiozor, has maintained the need for the Presidency to embrace equity, justice and fairness in public policy formulations and execution.
“And that the various forms of agitation in Nigeria is an effect and not a cause in itself. The cause of the agitations is the obvious injustice in federal public policies.
“Measures should rather be taken to address the causes of the agitations; and, only then, can Nigeria have peace and sustainable economic growth.
“On the other hand, Mazi Nnamdi Kanu and Sunday Igboho, who wittingly or unwittingly are now seen as heroes by their people, are but the products of unjust society.
“Therefore, a concerted effort in search of the Kanus and the Igbohos, without addressing the basis of the agitation, is an effort in futility. Otherwise, other Kanus and Igbohos will sooner than later emerge,” Ohanaeze stated.