Tag: governors

  • PDP Defends Wike, Accuses APC Governors of Fear of 2027 Contest

    PDP Defends Wike, Accuses APC Governors of Fear of 2027 Contest

    The Peoples Democratic Party has defended the Minister of the Federal Capital Territory, Nyesom Wike, following the rejection of his political support for President Bola Tinubu by the All Progressives Congress Governors’ Forum.

    The PDP said Wike remained a major political force whose support could contribute significantly to Tinubu’s re-election bid, insisting that the minister had the constitutional right to decide whom he would support politically.

    The party stated this in a press release issued on Tuesday and signed by its National Publicity Secretary, Jungudo Haruna Mohammed.

    The statement followed the position of the APC governors that their members would not participate in, support or endorse any political arrangement capable of undermining the APC or its candidates ahead of the 2027 general elections.

    The PDP argued that Wike was not the problem of the APC governors, but that their concerns were rooted in their governance records and fear of facing strong opposition candidates at the polls.

    “The APC Governors’ Forum should understand that Wike is not their problem; their problem is their poor governance and failure to meet the expectations of their people,” the party said.

    According to the PDP, Wike’s support for Tinubu did not amount to an endorsement of the APC or require him to abandon his membership and political relationships within the PDP.

    It said the minister, who is serving in the APC-led Federal Government, could legitimately support Tinubu while retaining his political identity.

    The opposition party accused the APC governors of initially misinterpreting Wike’s support for Tinubu as support for the ruling party.

    “The APC governors had initially misconceived Wike’s support for President Bola Ahmed Tinubu as an endorsement of the APC. They are now beginning to realise that supporting the President does not mean abandoning the PDP or surrendering the political space to the APC,” the statement said.

    The PDP also rejected what it described as the governors’ attempt to prevent Wike from supporting or fielding candidates capable of challenging APC candidates in the 2027 elections.

    It argued that political parties had the right to field candidates for elective positions and that voters should be allowed to determine the outcome.

    “Elections are contests, and every political party has the democratic right to present candidates before the electorate,” the party said.

    The PDP further claimed that the APC governors’ position reflected anxiety over the prospect of facing strong PDP candidates in the next general elections.

    It maintained that the PDP had stabilised and was preparing candidates across elective positions who could challenge APC incumbents and their preferred candidates.

    The party questioned why governors who were confident in their records would be concerned about opposition candidates contesting against them.

    “If they have truly performed and retained the confidence of their people, they should welcome a contest and allow the electorate to decide,” the PDP said.

    The party also highlighted Wike’s political record as a former governor of Rivers State and his performance as FCT minister, describing him as a political organiser and mobiliser whose influence could not simply be ignored.

    It argued that rejecting Wike’s support would be counterproductive for anyone seeking Tinubu’s victory in 2027.

    “It is therefore politically irrational for anyone claiming to support the President to reject a political leader of Wike’s stature and the votes and mobilisation capacity he can bring to the President’s campaign,” the statement said.

    The PDP questioned whether the APC governors were more interested in securing their own political victories than ensuring Tinubu’s re-election.

    “A governor who truly wants the President to win should welcome every credible political force capable of contributing to that victory,” it said.

    The party urged the governors to focus on governance, accountability and their performance in office instead of attempting to determine whom Wike should support politically.

    It also challenged them to account for resources accruing to their states through the Federation Account Allocation Committee and ensure that local governments receive funds due to them.

    Describing Wike as an “asset” to Tinubu’s political project, the PDP said his political influence and mobilisation capacity could contribute to the President’s electoral prospects.

    It, however, maintained that the ultimate decision would rest with voters in 2027.

    “At the appropriate time, Nigerians will decide with their votes. Those who have performed will present their records, while those who have failed will face the judgment of the electorate,” the party said.

    The PDP said it would not be intimidated into withdrawing from the electoral contest, adding that it would field candidates and campaign for an alternative ahead of the 2027 elections.

    “The message to the APC Governors’ Forum is simple: Chief Barrister Nyesom Wike is a force to reckon with, not a force to reject,” the party said.

    It added, “The PDP will not be intimidated into abandoning the electoral field. We will field credible candidates, mobilise Nigerians and offer the electorate a genuine alternative come 2027.”

  • 2027: APC Governors Reject Alliance With Wike’s Rainbow Coalition

    2027: APC Governors Reject Alliance With Wike’s Rainbow Coalition

    Precious Nwonu, Enugu

    Governors elected on the platform of the All Progressives Congress have ruled out any political alliance with individuals or opposition groups ahead of the 2027 general elections.

    The governors said they remained committed to the APC and would support only candidates sponsored by the ruling party in the forthcoming elections.

    Chairman of the APC Governors Forum and Imo State Governor, Hope Uzodimma, disclosed this after the forum’s meeting in Abuja on Monday night.

    Uzodimma said the governors had not entered into any formal agreement with any individual or opposition party ahead of the elections.

    The position comes amid the growing activities of the Minister of the Federal Capital Territory and Peoples Democratic Party leader, Nyesom Wike, who has been promoting a political movement known as the Rainbow Coalition in Rivers State.

    Wike, who is serving in the APC-led Federal Government, has declared his support for President Bola Tinubu’s re-election bid in 2027 while maintaining that his Rainbow Coalition is separate from the APC.

    The minister has also been at odds with some APC governors over political matters.

    During a recent media chat, Wike alleged that Uzodimma and Kwara State Governor, AbdulRahman AbdulRazaq, were among those behind the political challenges he had faced.

    He attributed the alleged opposition to the growing influence of his Rainbow Coalition, which he said was attracting politicians interested in contesting against some APC governorship and senatorial candidates in 2027.

    However, the APC governors, in a communique read by Uzodimma after their meeting, said they would not support any political arrangement that could undermine the party or its candidates.

    The forum said its campaign efforts would be directed exclusively towards APC candidates at all levels.

    Uzodimma said, “The APC Governors Forum unanimously resolved that its members will not participate in, support or endorse any alliance or political arrangement capable of undermining the re-election of Mr President, weakening the APC or adversely affecting any candidate of the party at all levels.”

    He added that the governors would not support candidates outside the APC.

    “In other words, the forum has no intention to support any candidate at any level that is not an APC candidate because our candidates who are contesting the election are being sponsored by our party,” he said.

    According to the Imo governor, the forum’s campaign strategy would remain aligned with President Tinubu and the leadership of the APC.

    “The governors’ campaign commitment is exclusively to all APC candidates. All levels of the party campaign architecture will align with the expectations of Mr President and the strategic objectives of the party,” he said.

    The declaration effectively draws a line between the APC governors’ official political activities and Wike’s Rainbow Coalition, despite the minister’s support for Tinubu’s second-term bid.

    The 2027 elections are expected to produce further realignments as political parties and influential politicians intensify efforts to consolidate support ahead of the polls.

  • ASUU Strike: Final year law student files suit against Buhari, governors, top politicians

    The ongoing dispute between the federal government and the Academic Staff Union of Universities (ASUU) has taken another dimension with a suit by a final year law student, Soohemba Agatha Aker, asking the court to stop the salaries and allowances of President Mohammadu Buhari, the 36 state governors and of all political office holders in the country pending the immediate resolution and end of the strike.

    The applicant, a student of Benue State University, Markudi, is seeking similar order against the Chief of Staff to the President, Secretary to the Government, all senators and members of House of Representative, all ministers, all the permanent secretaries, all heads of parastatals & extra ministerial bodies of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, all the vice chancellors and the members of senate of striking universities, as well as the salaries and allowance of of said striking Universities and all the members of the ASUU.

    In the fundamental right enforcement suit marked FHC/ABJ/CS/1684/2022, the applicant who said she is currently affected by the ongoing strike, filed the action for herself on behalf of all students of public tertiary institutions currently affected by the nationwide ASUU strike.

    In the suit filed by his counsel, Chukwuma-Machukwu Ume, SAN, the applicant listed the respondents to include the Federal Government of Nigeria, Registered Trustees of the Academic Staff Union of Universities, President of the Senate, Speaker of the House of Representatives and the Governor of Abia State (also sued in his own official capacity and in representative capacity for all the other Governors of the Thirty-Five States of the Federation).

    The rest are Revenue Mobilization Allocation and Fiscal Commission(RMAFC); Federation of Account Allocation Committee (FAAC); Attorney General of the Federation and Minister of Justice (AGF); the Attorney General of Abia State (also sued in representative capacity for all the other Hon Attorney-Generals of the Thirty-Five States of the Federation); the Vice Chancellor (VC) of the University of Abuja (also sued in representative capacity for all the other Vice Chancellors and the Members of the Senate of both Federal and State Universities currently participating on the ongoing ASUU Strike) and Umar Faruk (President, National Association of Nigerian Students, NANS).

    The was filed pursuant to section 46(1), (2) and (3) of the 1999 constitution and Article 17(1) of the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights (Ratification and Enforcement) Act Chapter A9 (Charter 10 LFN 1990) No. 2 of 1983.

    The applicant is equally seeking an order of mandamus compelling the defendants including members of Senate of the striking universities to return to the 1st Respondent their monthly salaries, allowances, and other benefits received individually or collectively from the day the industrial action of the 2nd Respondent commenced till date, pending the hearing and determination of the originating motion.

    She further asked for an order of interlocutory injunction suspending the activities of 6th and 7th Respondent (RMAFC and FAAC) including payment of the monthly allocation funds to the 3rd, 4th, 5th, 8th, 9th & 10th Respondents pending the hearing and determination of the Applicant’s Suit.

    In a supporting affidavit, she deposed to the fact that the ASUU strike has and continue to affect her adversely as her plans of graduating this academic year 2022 and to apply for admissions into the Nigerian Law School have been thwarted.

    That her tuition fees paid for this academic year will go in vain as the academic year is almost lost if nothing is done.

    She stated further that her dreams of becoming a law graduate and a future lawyer are at the verge of collapsing as her sponsor had made it clear that this year was the last year to sponsor her in school.

    That her mates who are children of top politicians are currently taking their studies uninterrupted in private universities in the country or abroad.

    That some of her mates have gotten pregnant due to boredom and idleness.

    That she is going through severe mental stress and trauma each passing day as the strike prolongs with no concrete action taken by the stakeholders concerned towards ending it.

    She therefore asked the court to declare that refusal, failure or neglect of the 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 4th, 5th, 10th and 11th Respondents to put an end to the lingering industrial action (strike) of the members of the 2nd Respondent Union is wrongful, gross failure of duty to the future of Nigeria, act of negligence to their constitutional responsibilities and amounts to a gross violation of the Applicants’ constitutional rights to meaningful life, association, education and developed capacity to own functional intellectual cum physical property.

    A declaration that refusal, failure or neglect of the 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 4th, 5th, 10th and 11th Respondents to put an end to the lingering industrial action (strike) of the members of the 2nd Respondent Union (most of whose children are abroad attending the best universities) is a function of act of discrimination in the affording of educational opportunities to their children abroad and the neglected Applicant and teeming types all over the country.

    An order compelling the 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 4th, 5th, 10th and 11th Respondents to immediately and forthwith inaugurate a Save the Future Think-Tank Committee of all parties herein, or their representatives and other key stakeholders from all tiers of government and segment of the Nigerian societies as to map out immediate steps as to end the ongoing strike by 2nd Respondent and ensure uninterrupted academic calendar in all Nigerian tertiary institutions even in times of any of the industrial disputes in the sector.

    (Sun)

  • State Governors oppose direct primaries ammendment in the Electoral Bill

     

    Civil society groups on electoral reforms have said that state governors opposed to certain amendments in the Electoral Bill cannot dictate to the President, Major General Muhammadu Buhari (retd.).

     

    They described the position of some governors on the mode of primary and other items in the Electoral Act Amendment Bill as “unpopular and narrow,” stating that their interest should not override the public interest.

     

    The CSOs stated this in a statement titled, ‘Electoral Act: Governors cannot dictate to Buhari,’ issued on Sunday by the Executive Director, Adopt A Goal for Development Initiative, Ariyo-Dare Atoye, and endorsed by the Centre for Liberty, Raising New Voices, Youth and Students Advocates for Development Initiative, The Nigerian Alliance, The Art and Civics Table and Speak Out Africa Initiative.

    The coalition observed that since the President could not dictate to the governors what they do with bills passed at the state level, it was also his prerogative to sign the Electoral Bill into law based on popular demand.

     

    The CSOs also urged the governors not to obstruct the popular will of Nigerians on the bill, but they should concentrate on rebuilding their parties, ensuring internal party reforms, digitisation of membership registration and dues payments.

     

    The statement read in part, “The position of some of our governors on the new Electoral Act Amendment Bill is unpopular and narrow, and it conflicts with the public interest of Nigerians.

     

    Read AlsoWe must uphold family values to rebuild society -BuhariTwo months after, N’Assembly yet to pass Buhari’s amendments to PIAProffer solutions to herdsmen/farmers crisis, Buhari tells FUTA

     

    “Our governors should not serve as obstacles or constitute an impediment to the signing of the new Electoral Bill because it has substantially met the expectations of Nigerians.

     

    “It is the prerogative of Mr. President to sign the bill and make history, and it is not in the public interest for the governors to ask him not to sign it.

     

    “The President has a glorious opportunity to take a popular action, etch his name in gold and side with the people by signing the bill into law.”

     

     

     

     

    Source: www.punchng.com

     

  • Insecurity : “The Nigerian government has failed on security” – Falana

    Lagos lawyer Femi Falana’s wife, Mrs Funmi Falana, on Sunday said the president, Major General Muhammadu Buhari (retd.), and the 36 state governors should resign from office if they were helpless on the insecurity in the country.

    Falana, who is also a human rights activists, said governments had failed on security and something needed to be done, lamenting that “Nigerians are afraid to go out, Nigerians fear for their lives, they are afraid for their security. It is very sad. Nobody ever envisaged that Nigeria will get to a situation like this.”

    The human rights lawyer, who spoke in Iyin Ekiti, Ekiti State, during her yearly New Year celebration with motherless children, called on states yet to domesticate the Child’s Right Law to do so.

    She said, “There is the need to do something about the security of the citizens. A government that is unable to guarantee the security of the citizens is a failed government, so if they cannot protect the Nigerian people, the governments have failed.

    “We are using this opportunity to remind them that it is the constitutional responsibility of the government under Chapter Two of the constitution to provide security for the people. It is as if they are helpless, if they are helpless, let them resign and let us know that we don’t have government,” Falana said.

    Falana said that her yearly celebration with the children “is our way of giving back to the needy in the society because these people really need the expression of our love and also to let them know that they are important in t he society.”

    The matron of the children’s home, Mrs Olayinka Ajayi, said Falana’s contributions in the last few years had made significant impact in the lives of the children.

     

    Source : www.punchng.com