Tag: Atiku

  • 2027 Election: Atiku, ADC Seek To Amend Suit Challenging Tinubu’s Eligibility

    2027 Election: Atiku, ADC Seek To Amend Suit Challenging Tinubu’s Eligibility

    Precious Nwonu, Enugu

    The Federal High Court in Abuja has adjourned until October 13 to hear an application by former Vice President Atiku Abubakar and the African Democratic Congress seeking to amend their suit challenging President Bola Tinubu’s eligibility to contest the 2027 presidential election.

    Justice Inyang Ekwo fixed the date on Monday after counsel for the plaintiffs, Joseph Silas, informed the court that all the defendants had been served with the relevant court processes within the stipulated period.

    Silas also told the court that the plaintiffs had received and responded to the processes filed by the defendants.

    The case had previously been delayed over a dispute concerning the service of court processes on Tinubu, who is the first defendant in the suit.

    During Monday’s proceedings, counsel to the President, Wole Olanipekun, SAN, recalled that at the September 1 hearing, counsel representing the Independent National Electoral Commission, Popoola Owosanya, had offered to receive the processes on Tinubu’s behalf.

    Olanipekun said the plaintiffs’ counsel rejected the offer and later approached the court for an order allowing substituted service on the President, claiming that efforts to serve him personally had been unsuccessful.

    He further alleged that the plaintiffs subsequently attempted to mislead the court by maintaining that they had been unable to serve the President.

    Justice Ekwo, however, directed the lawyers to concentrate on the matter scheduled for the day.

    Silas subsequently informed the court that the plaintiffs had filed an application seeking to amend their originating summons and that all the defendants had been served with the application.

    After confirming that the parties had received the relevant processes, Justice Ekwo adjourned the matter to October 13 for hearing of the application.

    Atiku and the ADC had instituted the suit to challenge Tinubu’s eligibility to participate in the 2027 presidential election.

    A major aspect of their case concerns an alleged discrepancy between the name appearing on a National Youth Service Corps discharge certificate submitted to the Independent National Electoral Commission and the President’s official name.

    The substantive issues raised by the plaintiffs are yet to be determined by the court.

    On September 16, Justice Ekwo granted the plaintiffs permission to serve Tinubu through the All Progressives Congress after they told the court that attempts to personally serve the President had proved difficult.

    The substituted service order was subsequently challenged by the APC, which argued that Tinubu’s legal representatives had already received the originating processes and filed his defence before the plaintiffs applied for substituted service.

    Meanwhile, INEC has filed a response challenging the competence of the suit, including arguments concerning the plaintiffs’ locus standi and alleged abuse of court process.

  • Atiku Demands Explanation for Tinubu’s Absence From 81st UNGA

    Atiku Demands Explanation for Tinubu’s Absence From 81st UNGA

    Precious Nwonu, Enugu

    Former Vice President Atiku Abubakar has questioned President Bola Tinubu’s decision to stay away from the 81st United Nations General Assembly in New York, demanding an explanation for his absence.

    Atiku’s criticism followed the decision by Tinubu to mandate Vice President Kashim Shettima to represent him and lead Nigeria’s delegation to the annual gathering of world leaders.

    Shettima departed Nigeria for New York on Sunday and arrived ahead of the high-level General Debate, which is scheduled to run from September 22 to 28, 2026. The session is being held under the theme, “Restoring trust, managing transformation: A United Nations that delivers for all.”

    In a statement issued by his Senior Special Assistant on Public Communication, Phrank Shaibu, Atiku described Tinubu’s absence as his third consecutive non-attendance at the UN General Assembly since becoming President.

    Tinubu attended the 78th UNGA in 2023, but was represented by Shettima at the 79th session in 2024 and the 80th in 2025. Shettima will now represent him for a third successive year.

    Atiku argued that the General Assembly provides heads of government with an important opportunity to advance their countries’ interests, pursue investment and trade partnerships, mobilise development financing and engage other world leaders on international issues.

    He said while Shettima could adequately represent Nigeria, repeated delegation could not replace the President’s personal participation and visibility at a major diplomatic gathering.

    Atiku also questioned whether Tinubu’s past legal history in the United States had any connection with his decision not to attend this year’s meeting, although no official statement has linked the President’s absence to any restriction on his travel to the US.

    The Presidency has rejected suggestions that Tinubu’s absence is connected to any difficulty travelling to the United States.

    Senior Special Assistant to the President on Foreign Affairs and Protocol, Ademola Osodi, said there was no impediment to Tinubu travelling to the US, pointing to the President’s previous visits to the country.

    Osodi said the President’s absence would not diminish Nigeria’s diplomatic standing or its role in international affairs, describing the issue as political.

    Nigeria’s Permanent Representative to the United Nations, Ambassador Jimoh Ibrahim, also defended the country’s representation, saying it was not unusual for countries to send senior officials when their presidents were unable to attend.

    Ibrahim said Nigeria would retain its designated position at the General Assembly, while Shettima and Foreign Affairs Minister Bianca Odumegwu-Ojukwu would participate in the high-level diplomatic engagements.

    Shettima is expected to deliver Nigeria’s national statement and participate in high-level meetings and bilateral engagements during the UNGA week.

    According to the Presidency, his engagements will focus on advancing Nigeria’s economic diplomacy, strengthening strategic partnerships and promoting the country’s interests on issues including global financial reform, sustainable development and climate finance.

    The Vice President, who arrived in New York on Monday, said Nigeria’s participation would be guided by national interest and its commitment to multilateralism.

    The Nigerian delegation includes Rivers State Governor Siminalayi Fubara, Zamfara State Governor Dauda Lawal, ministers and other senior government officials.

    The 81st UN General Assembly is expected to bring together representatives of the UN’s 193 member states for discussions on international issues including global security, climate change, development, artificial intelligence and reform of multilateral institutions.

  • Keyamo Criticises Atiku Over Reference to Tinubu as ‘Bola’

    Keyamo Criticises Atiku Over Reference to Tinubu as ‘Bola’

    Precious Nwonu, Enugu

    Minister of Aviation and Aerospace Development, Festus Keyamo, has criticised former Vice-President Atiku Abubakar over his repeated reference to President Bola Tinubu by his first name during a press conference in Abuja.

    Keyamo, in a post on his X account on Friday, described Atiku’s reference to the President as “very disrespectful and discourteous”, arguing that the office of the President should be treated with dignity despite political disagreements.

    “The continuous reference to President Bola Ahmed Tinubu by His Excellency, ex-Vice-President Atiku Abubakar in his Press Conference earlier today as ‘Bola’ is very disrespectful and discourteous,” Keyamo said.

    He added that political differences should not affect the respect accorded to the office of the President.

    “He should know better that no matter your differences with Mr President, for the sake of the country, that office should be accorded all the dignity it deserves,” the minister said.

    Keyamo also took issue with the tone of Atiku’s remarks, alleging that they reflected personal grievances.

    “The tone reeks of pain and bitterness in his heart,” he said.

    The minister further referred to Atiku’s recent comments about the ages of the two politicians, arguing that it was inconsistent for the former vice-president to describe Tinubu as older than himself while addressing him by his first name.

    “After all, he made the outlandish claim the other day that Mr President is older than himself. It is therefore a contradiction that he would also refer to an ‘elder’ by his first name,” Keyamo said.

    Atiku had, during the Friday press conference, called on Tinubu to take measures to reduce petrol prices and ease the pressure of rising living costs.

    The former vice-president urged the President to consider his proposed government intervention, saying Tinubu could rename the idea and take credit for it if that would result in lower petrol prices for Nigerians.

    “Tinubu should not be ashamed to do what is necessary to lower the price of petrol simply because Atiku Abubakar proposed a government intervention.

    “He should just take the idea, rename it if he wishes, and even take the credit. What matters to me is that Nigerians pay less,” Atiku said.

    He also argued that a policy proposal should not be rejected simply because it came from a political opponent and called for measures that would provide more lasting relief to households.

    Atiku’s remarks came amid continuing concerns over petrol prices and the wider impact of energy and transportation costs on the cost of living.

  • Atiku Questions Petrol Price, Demands Probe of Subsidy Savings

    Atiku Questions Petrol Price, Demands Probe of Subsidy Savings

    Precious Nwonu, Enugu

    Former Vice President and African Democratic Congress presidential candidate, Atiku Abubakar, has criticised the Federal Government over the high cost of petrol, questioning the management of revenues following the removal of fuel subsidy.

    Atiku, in a statement issued by his Senior Special Assistant on Public Communication, Phrank Shaibu, said Nigerians were now paying as much as ₦1,470 per litre for petrol despite crude oil selling at about $102.52 per barrel.

    He compared the current situation with 2008, when crude oil reportedly reached $147 per barrel but petrol sold for ₦65 per litre under the late President Umaru Musa Yar’Adua.

    Atiku described the current arrangement as “an organised system of grand larceny”, alleging that opaque deductions from the Federation Account, questionable revenue management and off-book transactions had raised concerns about the handling of public funds.

    He also questioned what had happened to the savings from the removal of fuel subsidy, recalling that Nigerians were told the policy would release funds for investment in education, healthcare and infrastructure.

    “Petrol at ₦1,470 per litre is not merely a figure at the filling station. It enters the price of transportation, food, school runs, farming, manufacturing and virtually everything Nigerians buy,” Atiku said.

    He added, “After all the pain imposed on Nigerians, they have a right to ask: where are the subsidy savings and where is the money?”

    The ADC presidential candidate cited Federal Account Allocation Committee records which, according to him, showed that the Federation Account recorded gross revenue of ₦4.232tn in June 2025, while only ₦1.818tn was distributed.

    Atiku demanded a comprehensive reconciliation of government revenues from 2023 to date, including details of gross collections, deductions, the legal basis for each deduction, receiving accounts and the ultimate beneficiaries of the funds.

    He also called for greater transparency concerning the Renewed Hope Infrastructure Development Fund, OML 143, NNPC LNG trading operations, offshore corporate structures and what he described as alleged unofficial crude lifting.

    The former vice president further rejected international oil prices as a sufficient explanation for the high cost of petrol in Nigeria.

    He noted that petrol prices in the United States, which he put at about $1.14 per litre, were comparable to prices in Nigeria, but stressed that the US federal minimum wage was $7.25 per hour, compared with Nigeria’s ₦70,000 monthly minimum wage.

    “Tinubu has brought Nigerians close to American fuel prices while leaving them with Nigerian poverty wages. That is the true cost of his subsidy-removal policy,” Atiku said.

    He urged the Federal Government to make verifiable financial records available to the public and engage independent forensic auditors to examine and reconcile the accounts.

    Atiku maintained that accountability in the management of public resources was a fundamental obligation to Nigerians and should not be treated as optional.

  • Melaye Threatens Mass Action If Atiku Is Arrested Over EFCC Petition

    Melaye Threatens Mass Action If Atiku Is Arrested Over EFCC Petition

    Precious Nwonu, Enugu

    Former Kogi West Senator Dino Melaye has warned the Federal Government against arresting, inviting or interrogating African Democratic Congress presidential candidate Atiku Abubakar over a corruption petition submitted to the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission.

    Melaye said the ADC and its supporters would resist any attempt to use the petition to target Atiku, insisting that the opposition would demonstrate the strength of public support if the former Vice-President was invited or arrested.

    He made the remarks in a video posted on his X account on Friday.

    “This is our note of warning, if due to this frivolous petitions you invite, arrest, or interview Atiku Abubakar, and we are not saying it with fear or favour, we will prove to you that those in government are less than one percent of the population of the Federal Republic of Nigeria. We will prove to you that the people own government,” Melaye said.

    His comments followed a petition submitted to the EFCC by a former member of the House of Representatives, Ehiozuwa Agbonayinma, seeking the reopening of corruption allegations against Atiku dating back to his time as Vice-President.

    The petition, signed by Agbonayinma’s lawyer, Hannibal Uwaifo, SAN, reportedly referred to an earlier EFCC investigation and report concerning allegations involving Atiku.

    The allegations date back to 2005 and 2006, when the EFCC and an administrative panel investigated claims including abuse of office, money laundering and alleged diversion of funds linked to the Petroleum Technology Development Fund.

    Atiku, who was Vice-President at the time, denied wrongdoing and described the allegations as politically motivated.

    On December 20, 2006, a Lagos State High Court reportedly set aside the EFCC’s administrative indictment against Atiku, holding that the process was unconstitutional and flawed.

    The allegations did not result in a criminal conviction against the former Vice-President.

    The renewed petition comes as Atiku prepares to contest the 2027 presidential election on the platform of the ADC, amid efforts by opposition politicians to challenge President Bola Tinubu and the ruling All Progressives Congress.

    Melaye, a prominent supporter of Atiku and the ADC, warned that the opposition would not remain silent if the petition was used as a basis for targeting the former Vice-President.

    However, there was no confirmed indication as of the time of filing the report that the EFCC had invited or arrested Atiku in connection with the latest petition.

  • Kwankwaso Urges Atiku to Quit 2027 Presidential Race

    Kwankwaso Urges Atiku to Quit 2027 Presidential Race

    Precious Nwonu, Enugu

    Vice-presidential candidate of the Nigeria Democratic Congress, Rabiu Kwankwaso, has urged former Vice-President Atiku Abubakar to withdraw from the 2027 presidential race.

    Kwankwaso, who is the running mate to NDC presidential candidate Peter Obi, made the appeal on Monday while speaking at his Abuja residence during a meeting with members of the Fulani Farmers Association.

    Speaking in Hausa, the former Kano State governor appealed to the group to advise Atiku, citing his age and health.

    “Go to the Wazirin of Adamawa’s house and tell him in Fulani that he needs to focus on his traditional title of Wazirin, given his age and health,” he said.

    Kwankwaso also promised that he and Obi would take care of Atiku if they emerge victorious in the 2027 election.

    “If Allah grants us success, we will take good care of him, especially since you all come from Adamawa. An apology should be offered to him,” he added.

    Atiku emerged as the African Democratic Congress presidential candidate in May 2026, setting the stage for another presidential contest.

    His emergence marked his latest attempt at securing Nigeria’s presidency after first contesting for the position in 1993.

    The former Vice-President was the Peoples Democratic Party presidential candidate in the 2019 election, where he lost to then-incumbent President Muhammadu Buhari.

    Speaking after his emergence as the ADC candidate, Atiku pledged to focus on national unity, security, economic development, education and greater devolution of resources and powers to Nigeria’s federating units.

    “This time around is different; our journey will not end at the poll; we will get to work and rescue Nigeria. I invite every Nigerian to join me in this mission to save our dear country,” he said.

    Atiku also promised to pursue a liberal economy with lower taxes for small businesses and low-income earners if elected president.

    “I have never been this optimistic, and with your support and God’s grace, we will get to the promised land,” he said.

  • Atiku Knocks Tinubu Over 24.7tn Borrowing, Says Government Is Choking Businesses of Credit

    Atiku Knocks Tinubu Over 24.7tn Borrowing, Says Government Is Choking Businesses of Credit

    Atiku says government borrowing surged to N24.7tn despite higher oil prices, squeezing private-sector credit and worsening economic hardship.

    Former Vice President, Atiku Abubakar, on Monday described the federal government’s ‘unprecedented’ appetite for domestic borrowing as evidence of dangerous fiscal indiscipline that is starving Nigerian businesses of credit, killing jobs and worsening the cost-of-living crisis.

    In a statement issued by his Senior Special Assistant on Public Communication, Phrank Shaibu, Atiku said it was particularly alarming that the Bola Tinubu administration continues to borrow at such a frightening pace at a time when crude oil prices have risen substantially above the assumptions upon which the 2026 budget was built.

    “At the beginning of this fiscal year, the federal government budgeted on an oil benchmark of $64.85 per barrel. Today, crude oil prices have risen substantially above that benchmark.

    “Yet, instead of this windfall translating into lower borrowing, stronger businesses and relief for Nigerians, the federal government went into the domestic market and borrowed a staggering N24.7 trillion between January and August 2026 — 90.5 per cent more than the N12.98 trillion borrowed in the corresponding period of 2025.

    ‘’This is a government borrowing like drunken sailors in the middle of a revenue windfall. Tinubu removed fuel subsidy and told Nigerians the sacrifice would free up money. He floated the naira and government revenues consequently received a massive nominal boost. Oil prices have risen sharply. Revenues have improved. Yet the borrowing has not gone down — it has exploded,” the former vice president stressed.

    According to him, Nigerians must begin to ask what the money saved fromfuel subsidy has been spent on.

    “What makes this recklessness even more damaging is that the government is now competing directly with Nigerian businesses for money. Credit to the government grew by 43 per cent, while credit to the private sector grew by only 9.6 per cent. Government credit is expanding about 4.5 times faster than credit to businesses.

    “This is yet another troubling signal that the Tinubu economic reforms have failed to produce any meaningful impact on the private sector,’’ Atiku added.

    Atiku said that ordinarily, the outlook and performance of the private sector should serve as one of the clearest yardsticks for measuring the effectiveness of government economic policy.

    He said: ‘’If businesses are expanding, investing, hiring and gaining easier access to capital, then reform can claim some measure of success.

    “But under Tinubu’s economic policy, the exact opposite is happening. The public sector is exerting an increasingly parasitic effect on the private sector — consuming the credit, capital and financial oxygen that productive businesses desperately need. That, at a glance, is one of the clearest indictments of the failure of these so-called reforms.

    “When banks can lend to the government at attractive, risk-free rates, why would they lend cheaply to the manufacturer in Aba, the furniture maker in Kaduna, the agro-processor in Kano or the young entrepreneur in Lagos?

    “The result is obvious: businesses pay more for credit, expansion is postponed, factories struggle, jobs disappear and the cost of producing everything from food to household goods rises. This government is not merely borrowing money; it is borrowing away the future of Nigerian businesses.”

    He stated that Nigeria cannot achieve prosperity by allowing the government to swallow the credit that should finance production, stressing that an economy grows when businesses borrow to build factories, farmers borrow to expand production and entrepreneurs access affordable capital to create jobs.

    “My administration will impose fiscal discipline, cut waste, prioritiseproductive expenditure and progressively reduce the government’s suffocating dependence on the domestic credit market.

    The government must make room for the private sector to breathe, invest, produce and employ.

    “After three years of sacrifice, Nigerians deserve to see what happened to the subsidy savings, the additional revenues and the crude-oil windfall. You cannot collect more, earn more and still borrow more — while asking hungry Nigerians to sacrifice more. Something is fundamentally wrong with that equation,” he argued.

    Meanwhile, the African Democratic Congress (ADC) on Monday alleged that the Auditor-General’s finding that N33.75 billion in cash transfers to 3.29 million households cannot be verified was proof that under Tinubu, social investment had become a racket run for the benefit of officials, not the poor.

    In a statement, ADC’s National Publicity Secretary, Mallam Bolaji Abdullahi, stated: “Let us call this what it is. Not mismanagement. Not an oversight. It is an organised racket, which this government has run under the guise of a social intervention programme. They are stealing from the poor and telling them to continue to endure hardship.

    “This latest report of an unaccounted N33.75 billion intervention fund, buried inside a larger N78 billion fund, and the historical pattern of corruption that has trailed this kind of programme would suggest that this government has found a way to steal from the poor by turning the social intervention programme into a criminal enterprise,” the party stated.

    Abdullahi said instead of the federal government addressing the wanton corruption associated with such interventions in the past, it has announced an even bigger package of $1 billion without demonstrating that it has made any effort to ensure greater transparency and accountability.

    “Barely weeks before this audit blew up in their faces, they wheeled out a new $1 billion so-called ‘Renewed Hope Social Protection Programme’ with the usual State House fanfare. Given the familiar history, we are in no doubt that even in the unlikely event that this latest intervention is ever implemented, it would end up like the others before it: another racket.”

    While demanding a full probe into the scheme, the ADC noted that interventions such as this became necessary because the APC government has made it impossible for people to earn a dignified living.

    “Their twin disastrous policies of fuel subsidy removal and currency devaluation have exploded the population of Nigerians living in extreme poverty and therefore needing cash handouts from the government, which has now become a mere pretext for stealing in the name of the poor.

    “This is a government that manufactured hardship with one hand and pocketed the relief with the other. Fuel prices up. Transport costs up. Food prices up. And the one programme meant to soften the blow turns out to be a black hole. Enough is enough,” it added.

    The party, therefore, demanded the immediate publication of the full beneficiary register, the REMITA payment trail, and the names of every official who obstructed the auditor-general. Arise News

     

  • 2027: Datti Baba-Ahmed Says Obi, Atiku, Others Can’t Fix Nigeria

    2027: Datti Baba-Ahmed Says Obi, Atiku, Others Can’t Fix Nigeria

    … Atiku: Tinubu subsidises friends, IOCs, won’t do same for poor Nigerians

     

    A vocal member of the opposition in Nigeria, Datti Baba-Ahmed, at the weekend said none of the politicians challenging President Bola Tinubu in the 2027 presidential election, including his erstwhile political ally, Peter Obi, and ex-Vice President, Atiku Abubakar, has the capacity to improve or change Nigeria.

    Baba-Ahmed, who was Obi’s running mate in the 2023 presidential election, disclosed that he had warned Obi against joining the African Democratic Congress (ADC), but the former Anambra State governor ignored his advice and subsequently moved away from what he described as his political “comfort zone”.

    The comments by Baba-Ahmed came as the the presidential candidate of the ADC in next year’s election, Atiku, yesterday accused Tinubu of subsidising his friends and the International Oil Companies (IOCs) but won’t do the same for poor and struggling Nigerians.

    But speaking on the MIC ON Podcast, hosted by Seun Okinbaloye, Baba-Ahmed said his political differences with Obi became more pronounced after the latter ignored his warning ahead of his move to the ADC.

    He said he personally approached Obi at the Yar’Adua Centre to express his reservations about the proposed defection, stressing that he had told him the ADC was not suitable for his political ambitions.

    “When he was going to join ADC, I had to go to Yar’Adua Centre ahead of him, so I called him aside. They were worried. Why is Datti calling Peter Obi aside and talking to him? And I told him, ‘This is the last time I’m coming to this place. I gave him my reasons. This is not a place for you.’ Was I wrong? I was proven right,” he said.

    According to Baba-Ahmed, Obi’s eventual departure from the ADC vindicated his earlier position, noting that he had predicted that the former governor would not remain in the party. “Within four months, Peter Obi left ADC,” he said.

    Baba-Ahmed also explained that Obi’s decision to move outside the political position he had advised him to maintain made it difficult for him to continue influencing his former running mate’s political choices.

    “Peter Obi moved out of his comfort zone against my advice. Beyond that point, I could no longer help him,” he said.

    The former federal lawmaker, who subsequently left the Labour Party for the Peoples Redemption Party (PRP) said he was also uncomfortable with what he described as contradictions in Obi’s political positions.

    “Now, I don’t like people who contradict themselves, and I don’t want to go into criticising again the politics of Atiku because that’s not what I’m about,” he said.

    On the 2027 presidential contest, Baba-Ahmed said Tinubu should prepare to leave office but should not hand over power to any of the politicians currently challenging him because, in his view, none of them had the capacity to improve the country.

    “I will simply advise uncle (Tinubu) to please prepare to hand over and move away, but not to the people contesting against him because none of them will improve Nigeria,” he said.

    Specifically, asked if he was referring to all the opposition politicians seeking to replace Tinubu, Baba-Ahmed replied: “None of that part. Tinubu should leave the stage. All those people contesting against him, too, they were all in bed together at some point or another.”

    When the interviewer particularly asked whether that included Obi, Baba-Ahmed responded: “Including Peter Obi, I’m sorry to say.”

    He argued that Obi had previously belonged to the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP), which was the ruling party at the time, questioning how politicians with such political histories could convincingly present themselves as agents of a new Nigeria. “Tell me one politician who has never been in a ruling party. Tell me,” he said.

    However, when reminded that he had also been involved in politics and had served in the National Assembly, Baba-Ahmed distinguished his political history from those of the politicians he was criticising.

    “I have never been in a ruling party. While I was in the CPC, CPC was the leading opposition party, even above ANPP then. When they merged with APC and came to power, you have my letter of resignation from the then APC because, even though I was, because I have never had a card, a membership card of APC. Never. I never had a membership card of APC,” he said.

    However, Baba-Ahmed maintained that his criticism was not simply about party membership but about the political history of the leading figures seeking to challenge Tinubu in 2027.

    Obi and Baba-Ahmed contested the 2023 presidential election on the Labour Party platform and finished third behind Tinubu of the All Progressives Congress (APC) and Atiku of the PDP.

    Atiku Accuses Tinubu of Discriminatory Subsidy Approval 

    Meanwhile, former Vice President and presidential candidate of the ADC, Atiku, yesterday accused  Tinubu of subsidising his friends and the International Oil Companies (IOCs) but won’t do the same for poor and struggling Nigerians.

    He also accused Tinubu of wrecking Nigerians’ purchasing power, emptying household pockets and pushing businesses to the brink through economic policies that have made virtually everything more expensive while leaving ordinary citizens with less money to survive.

    In a statement issued by his Senior Special Assistant on Public Communication, Phrank Shaibu, Atiku said Tinubu can no longer hide behind impressive economic figures announced from Abuja when Nigerians are living with the painful consequences of his decisions.

    He said Tinubu removed fuel subsidy from the people, presided over soaring fuel, transport and food costs, and is now attacking a ‘production subsidy’ proposal designed to reduce that burden and return money to Nigerians’ pockets.

    Atiku said the position being canvassed by the Crude Oil Refinery Owners Association of Nigeria (CORAN) for support for domestic refining, alongside President Donald Trump’s intervention to strengthen petroleum production and refining in the United States, further exposes the weakness of Tinubu’s argument against targeted support for Nigerian production.

    “Tinubu did not inherit this cost-of-living crisis from Nigerians. His policies created and deepened it. He took away relief from the people, made fuel, food, transport and basic survival more expensive, and now wants Nigerians to applaud statistics while their pockets are empty.

    “Recent reports that a significant share of the short-term assets of some of Nigeria’s biggest companies is now trapped in unpaid customer bills tell the same story: companies may record sales, but customers increasingly cannot pay because Tinubu’s economy has drained their purchasing power.

    “Take a woman selling frozen food in Kubwa. She pays more to transport her goods, more to power her freezer and more to restock. Her customers are poorer, so they buy less or ask for credit. Soon she cannot restock, her supplier is owed, and Tinubu’s economic pain spreads through the entire chain,” he stated.

    He stressed that Nigerians know the prices they come against daily, with fertiliser moving from about N9,000 to around N50,000; petrol from about N199 to around N1,400 per litre; cement from roughly N4,000 to around N13,500; and the dollar from around N450 to about N1,400.

    “And after all this pain, what has the ordinary Nigerian received? No reliable electricity. Loan for a degree. No security. No N-Power. Food is expensive. Transport is expensive. Life itself has become expensive. What exactly are Tinubu’s defenders defending?

    “This is why my Production Subsidy is about putting money back into people’s pockets. Support what we produce and refine here, increase supply, monitor the price and make sure Nigerians feel the benefit at the pump,” he argued.

    According to him, the point CORAN is making is that there’s a need to support domestic production, stressing that America understands the importance of supporting strategic energy production.

    “Yet Tinubu attacks relief for ordinary Nigerians while his government understands perfectly well how to grant waivers, incentives and concessions to multinational oil companies and businesses close to his administration.

    “So why does intervention suddenly become bad economics when ordinary Nigerians are meant to benefit?

    “Nigerians have now seen what Tinubu’s economics means in their daily lives: higher fuel prices, higher food prices, higher transport costs, weaker businesses and emptier pockets. They do not need another lecture on patience. They need relief.

    “The choice before Nigeria is therefore clear: continue with an economy that takes more from the people, or build one that puts money back in their pockets. Support production. Refine in Nigeria. Create Nigerian jobs. Lower the cost of living,” he added.

    The former VP urged Nigerians to reject a government that has made life harder and embrace a plan that makes life affordable again.

    “Enough of empty pockets. Enough of endless hardship. Nigeria must produce more, Nigerians must pay less, and families must have money left to live. Tinubu made life expensive. Atiku will make life affordable again,” Atiku maintained. This Day Live

     

  • ‘Young Nigerians Should Sell Dreams, Not Kidneys’ – Atiku

    ‘Young Nigerians Should Sell Dreams, Not Kidneys’ – Atiku

     Former Vice President Atiku Abubakar has raised alarm over what he described as a growing trend of young Nigerians selling their kidneys to survive amid the country’s cost-of-living crisis, blaming President Bola Tinubu’s economic policies for the development.

    The Africa Democratic Congress presidential candidate, in a post on X on Thursday, said he had heard “disturbing stories” of young Nigerians resorting to selling body organs, particularly kidneys, in desperate attempts to raise money.

    “I have heard disturbing stories about the extent to which young Nigerians are being driven simply to survive. Perhaps the most horrifying are the growing reports of young people selling parts of their bodies: kidneys in particular, in desperate attempts to raise money,” Atiku wrote.

    He said young Nigerians ought to be “selling dreams, ideas and innovation, not their body organs,” adding that the trend should “offend the conscience of every Nigerian.”

    Atiku claimed that young Nigerians were reportedly being driven to sell their kidneys for as little as ₦1.7m, a figure he did not attribute to any specific report or agency.

    PUNCH could not independently verify the figure as of the time of this report.

    The former Vice President linked the trend to the rising cost of living under the Tinubu administration, listing food, transport, rent, school fees, medicine and electricity as items that have become increasingly unaffordable for ordinary Nigerians.

    He said, “In Tinubu’s Nigeria, almost everything required to live with dignity is becoming more expensive by the day: food, transport, rent, school fees, medicine and electricity.

    “Yet young Nigerians are reportedly being driven to sell their kidneys for as little as ₦1.7 million.

    “That should break the heart of a nation.

    “Young Nigerians should be building careers, starting businesses, raising families and pursuing their dreams, not calculating how much parts of their bodies can fetch simply to stay alive.

    “When young Nigerians begin to see their kidneys as emergency savings, we are no longer talking about ordinary economic hardship. We are talking about desperation at its most frightening.”

    Atiku acknowledged that Nigeria already has laws prohibiting commercial organ sales and organ trafficking, but argued that “laws alone cannot cure the poverty and desperation that make vulnerable young people easy prey for criminal networks.”

    He called for economic reforms with “a human face,” including affordable food, cheaper transportation, accessible healthcare, decent jobs and “renewed hope for the next generation.”

    The former Vice President capped the statement with a direct jab at the President: “Tinubu made Nigeria expensive. I will make Nigeria affordable again.”

    Atiku’s remarks come amid a spate of reports and unverified claims about organ trafficking in parts of the country in recent weeks.

    The Nigeria Police Force recently paraded four suspects, including two nephrologists, over the alleged operation. Police said one of the suspects, Emmanuel Ode, allegedly admitted to recruiting victims and disclosed that a 22-year-old man had been lured to a hospital in Abuja in April, where his kidney was allegedly harvested for $1,250, equivalent to about N1.7m.

    Investigators said the alleged syndicate targeted vulnerable and financially desperate young people in Nasarawa and neighbouring areas. Punch

     

  • “If Tinubu Loses, Atiku, Obi Will Haunt Me” – Wike

    “If Tinubu Loses, Atiku, Obi Will Haunt Me” – Wike

    Precious Nwonu, Enugu

    The Minister of the Federal Capital Territory (FCT), Nyesom Wike, has stated that he would be the primary target of political retaliation from opposition figures, specifically Atiku Abubakar and Peter Obi, if President Bola Tinubu fails to secure re-election in 2027.

    Wike made the remarks during a live media chat in Port Harcourt, Rivers State, on Wednesday, September 2, 2026, where he fiercely defended his unrelenting campaign for Tinubu’s second term despite remaining an official member of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP).

    The minister has been locked in a bitter political battle with Atiku, who is now the 2027 presidential candidate for the African Democratic Congress (ADC), dating back to 2022 when Wike lost the PDP presidential ticket to him.

    Meanwhile, Peter Obi, who has emerged as the 2027 presidential candidate for the Nigeria Democratic Congress (NDC), had previously sought Wike’s support for his 2023 run on the Labour Party platform, though the minister ultimately chose to openly back Tinubu.

    Acknowledging the extreme personal and political exposure that comes with his vocal stance, Wike made it clear that his loyalty to Tinubu has left him personally exposed should the President’s re-election bid fail.

    “My concern is, I will support Mr President. If you watch what is happening today and look at it, peradventure anything happens and Mr President fails today, I will be the first politician that Atiku or Obi will hunt for his head. I challenge anybody. So, I won’t make that mistake of sleeping to see that the President loses the election,” Wike warned.

    The minister argued that his aggressive posture against opposition figures meant that a Tinubu defeat in 2027 would not only be a loss for his coalition but would also leave him personally vulnerable to political reprisal from a new administration.

    As political activities begin to gather momentum ahead of the January general elections, Wike vowed that he would not remain passive and allow Atiku to win the presidency, asking, “You want me to fold my hands for Atiku Abubakar to come and win the election?”

    During the parley, Wike also dismissed widespread reports suggesting he is planning to permanently relocate to Rivers State, explaining that his frequent visits home are part of deliberate efforts to stay politically engaged with his grassroots base.

    The minister argued that he has no intention of abandoning his cabinet responsibilities in Abuja, but refused to manage his political
    base by proxy or rely blindly on assurances from political associates ahead of the 2027 polls.

    “It’s not about relocating; it’s about coming home to relate with the people and talk to them, and also do those things you know how to do very well, not to take chances. So, I’m not relocating. I don’t need to relocate, but I also have to be in touch with my people so that I don’t just sit in Abuja and then say that everything is going on well there,” Wike explained, adding, “I don’t want to sit in Abuja, and candidates are saying, ‘Oh, don’t bother, everything is going on well’. I have to come home and see that all those things are going on. ‘Have you done this? What about this?’”

    Shifting focus to his performance as FCT Minister, Wike assured that all capital projects initiated under the current administration in the nation’s capital will be fully completed before the expiration of their tenure, highlighting the infrastructure projects executed by the FCT Administration under the Renewed Hope Agenda.

    “Before this tenure expires, every project started under Bola Tinubu would have been completed,” Wike vowed. He broke down the progress of 107 total capital projects initiated under the Tinubu administration in the FCT, noting that 76 projects have already been completed, 10 more projects will be inaugurated before the January elections, and the remaining 21 projects will be delivered before the end of the tenure.

    “The President’s administration under Bola Tinubu commissioned 107 capital projects. We have completed 76. Before the January election, we will commission 10, and before the end of his tenure, we would have commissioned all the projects,” he stated.

    Furthermore, the minister disclosed that the FCT Administration had made significant progress on legacy projects inherited from previous administrations. Specifically, he stated that 23 out of 25 projects inherited from the administration of former President Muhammadu Buhari have been completed,
    with work ongoing on the final two.

    Additionally, his administration inherited eight projects from the administrations of former Presidents Goodluck Jonathan and Umaru Yar’Adua, successfully completing six while two remain ongoing.

    “We inherited 25 projects from President Buhari and completed 23, while two are currently ongoing. We inherited eight projects from the administrations of President Jonathan and President Yar’Adua. We have completed six, while two are ongoing,” Wike detailed.

    Reaffirming the commitment of the FCTA to finishing all Tinubu-initiated developments, the minister concluded by challenging his critics to compare his infrastructural record with past governments, asserting, “In the history of the FCT, no government has done what we have done in Abuja. I challenge anyone to come out.”

  • Presidency Reacts to Atiku’s $1.2m US Lobbying Campaign Over Tinubu Records

    Presidency Reacts to Atiku’s $1.2m US Lobbying Campaign Over Tinubu Records

    The Presidency has criticised a United States lobbying firm engaged by former Vice President Atiku Abubakar over its campaign for the release of records relating to President Bola Tinubu, describing the effort as a politically motivated attempt to create a crisis ahead of the 2027 elections.

    The Special Adviser to the President on Media and Public Communications, Sunday Dare, made the position known in a statement on Tuesday titled, “Speculation as Classified Information: Atiku’s $1.2 million Lobbying Gamble Exposed.”

    Dare accused the Washington-based Von Batten-Montague-York, L.C. of presenting political claims as intelligence reports and attempting to give the impression that its statements represented the position of the United States government.

    The Presidency’s reaction followed renewed activities by the lobbying firm concerning historical United States records relating to Tinubu.

    According to Dare, publicly available filings under the US Foreign Agents Registration Act showed that Atiku contracted the lobbying firm on a 12-month retainer reportedly worth $1.2m.

    He alleged that the firm’s activities were part of an attempt by the former vice president’s camp to use historical US legal records to gain political leverage ahead of the 2027 general elections.

    Dare said the reports being circulated from Washington did not constitute the official position of the US government.

    He said, “The incendiary press releases being carefully churned out from Washington are public relations propaganda sheets passed off as the view of the U.S. Government. They are not.”

    The presidential aide challenged those behind the allegations to produce what they described as classified intelligence and identify their sources.

    “Sane minds must categorically dismiss these reports as fabricated, politically motivated, and entirely unsupported by evidence. The report presents no intelligence document, no named Western official, and no evidence of any exchange involving Nigeria’s secrets or resources.

    “It is nothing more than political speculation packaged as classified information. We demand that they produce the so-called “highly classified intelligence report,” identify their unnamed sources, and provide tangible evidence for their wild allegations,” Dare said.

    He also questioned the role of the founder of the lobbying firm, Karl Von Batten, describing him as a commercial lobbyist and not an official of the US government.

    “Dr. Karl Von Batten’s comments represent solely the position of an individual associated with Atiku-linked political interests, not the U.S. government or President Trump,” he said.

    The controversy centres on historical records held by US federal agencies concerning Tinubu and a 1990s civil forfeiture case involving funds forfeited to US authorities.

    The records are also the subject of ongoing Freedom of Information Act litigation in the United States.

    PUNCH Online had reported that a Senior Advocate of Nigeria and member of Tinubu’s legal team in the United States, Wole Afolabi, defended the legal challenge against the release of portions of the records.

    Afolabi, who spoke on Channels Television’s Sunday Politics, said the US government had already released thousands of pages of records but was seeking to keep some portions redacted to protect law enforcement methods, sources and agents.

    He said Tinubu’s legal team was relying on protections available under US law and that challenging the release of the redacted portions did not amount to an attempt to conceal incriminating information.

    Afolabi said, “This matter has been going on for quite some time, as you rightly said, and the DEA and other government agencies have produced documents and made available to Mr Greenspan.

    “Now Mr Greenspan is asking that documents should be unredacted before they are handed over to him. The way the system works is this: it’s not what you want, it’s what the law stipulates.

    “So precisely what we are doing is going under the coverage of the law. It’s what the law gives us the right to do. It would amount to professional malpractice on our part if we don’t take advantage of what the law offers.”

    He also dismissed the suggestion that the US government was withholding the records specifically to protect Tinubu.

    He said, “In one of the recent filings that was made recently by the Department of Justice, it was stated in the footnote at page 24 that their concern is about the methodology by which information is gathered.

    “No mention was made of any protection being offered to President Bola Ahmed Tinubu.”

    Afolabi also argued that if US authorities had found sufficient evidence linking Tinubu to drug trafficking, he would have been indicted and prosecuted.

    Asked whether he was saying Tinubu had never taken drugs, had never been caught with heroin or had never been involved in drug trafficking, Afolabi replied, “What the evidence shows.”

    He was also questioned about the $460,000 forfeited to US authorities in the 1990s and the circumstances surrounding the civil forfeiture proceeding.

    Afolabi maintained that a civil forfeiture did not amount to a finding of criminal culpability.

    “If he was culpable, he simply would have been indicted. There’s no shortcut around it. He would have been indicted,” he said.

    The lawyer, however, declined to disclose Tinubu’s account of the matter, citing attorney-client privilege.

    “I’m acting as his lawyer, and as a lawyer, there is what you call attorney-client privilege, and it’s taken very seriously over here. One can lose one’s licence very easily.

    “Unfortunately, I can’t divulge any information that my client had disclosed to me confidentially. I’m sorry,” he said.

    Afolabi also declined to give a direct yes-or-no answer when asked whether Tinubu had ever been investigated by the FBI or the Drug Enforcement Administration.

    He explained that law enforcement agencies could investigate individuals without such investigations establishing criminal culpability.

    “Anyone can be a subject of investigation. That’s just how it goes. I mean, there’s a presumption of innocence,” he said.

    The lawyer argued that the mere presence of a person’s name in law enforcement records should not automatically be interpreted as evidence of criminal wrongdoing.

    Afolabi further defended Tinubu’s legal team’s reliance on privacy protections in challenging the release of some of the records.

    He compared the situation with US President Donald Trump’s efforts to prevent the release of some of his academic records, arguing that public office holders do not automatically lose their legal rights to privacy.

    The lawyer said, “Everybody takes advantage of it. Everybody. If the law offers you protection, there’s a reason why the law is there.”

    The Presidency’s statement came amid continuing debate over the release of historical US law enforcement records relating to Tinubu.

    The Freedom of Information Act case remains before a US federal court, where arguments concerning the release and redaction of the records are being considered. Punch

  • Atiku’s Back to Back Party Primaries Hits, and Misses

    Atiku’s Back to Back Party Primaries Hits, and Misses

    By Demola Olarewaju

    The prowess of Atiku Abubakar when it comes to party primaries was not built in a day and his recent successes at that level are built on a foundation of loss, defeat and tears.

    His entry into politics in 1991 was marked by a bitter gubernatorial ticket rivalry between him and Bala Takaya, a rivalry so fierce that both men eventually were disqualified by the IBB regime. This disqualification was alongside the likes of Sule Lamido, Yusuf Sani, Dapo Sarumi, Femi Agbalajobi, Joe Nwodo, Hyde Onuaguluchi, Sergeant Awuse and others.

    Also disqualified were 23 aspirants for the presidential ticket in that 3rd Republic and Atiku was drafted by Shehu Musa Yar’Adua to run in his stead for President.

    With the backing of the powerful Yar’Adua machinery, Atiku came third in the first round of balloting, behind MKO Abiola and Babagana Kingibe. He was then asked to step down for Abiola and become his running mate but Abiola was forced by the SDP Governors to choose Kingibe instead. Atiku lost out, Atiku campaigned hard and Atiku delivered 140k+ Adamawa votes for SDP.

    In 1999 after running successfully for Governor, he became Vice-President and then clinched the ticket of the AC in 2007 by caucus consensus.

    By 2011, Atiku was back in the PDP and ran against sitting President Goodluck Jonathan, polling 805 delegates’ votes versus Jonathan’s 2,736. Atiku lost, Atiku campaigned hard and Atiku delivered Adamawa for PDP.

    2015, Atiku found himself in APC and ran against Muhammadu Buhari and others. He came in third place with 954 delegates’ votes. Atiku lost, Atiku campaigned hard and Atiku delivered Adamawa for APC.

    2019 – Atiku won the PDP presidential primaries in Port-Harcourt. Wike had then blackmailed PDP into bringing the National Convention to PH and within 24 hours, every single presidential suite in the city had become reserved. Wike claimed they said Atiku had paid for them and that he had asked them to return the man’s deposit. Atiku won the majority delegates’ votes defeating Saraki, Tambuwal, Sule Lamido etc.

    2023 – Atiku won the PDP presidential primaries after being stepped down for by Tambuwal, much to the chagrin of Wike who has been embittered since then.

    But notice Atiku never gets bitter after any primary or general election – he stays loyal and delivers votes for the candidate who defeated him and the party that hurt him.

    And that’s one secret of how the man does it: by staying loyal to the general cause even when his interest is threatened or eliminated, Atiku has built an army of trusted political friends that span into every single state, political party or group interest.

    By always subsuming his interest to the general interest per time, Atiku maintains razorlike focus on each KPI and in the process builds allies and sets up structure from the bottom up. Atiku doesn’t focus on the presidential primaries when Ward Excos are being elected, Atiku doesn’t think of his own aspiration while the party is looking for a National HQ building: to every political activity there is a time.

    Thirdly, Atiku’s structures aren’t ever only for him – this House of Reps aspirant, that senatorial or gubernatorial hopeful – his structural interests even push down to state excos – as I found out to my own party electoral loss when I ran for Lagos State PDP Publicity Secretary. Atiku never walks alone, he always aggregates other political interests.

    These are just three reasons (observable from outside) for why he is so formidable in party primaries. Those who think it is about money can go and ask Nyesom Wike about 2019 and 2023.

    I hope other presidential aspirants can learn from Atiku on both how to win primaries and how to accept defeat gracefully.

    As long as we agree that whoever loses will still work for the greater interest against the person now in Aso Rock, as Atiku has always done: we can meet at the primaries.